Table of Contents

“W” Quotations

WAFFLES

(see also CREPES and PANCAKES and SYRUP)

WAITING

(see also DELAY and EXPECTATION and PATIENCE)

WALKING

(see also BODY and EXERCISE and FITNESS and HEALTH and HIKING and JOURNEYS and LONGEVITY and MEANDERING and MEDICINE and RUNNING and STROLLING and WANDERING)

QUOTE NOTE: All over the internet, you will find a paraphrased version of this sentiment (“To learn something new, take the path that you took yesterday.”) as an actual quotation by Burroughs. It is not.

Card introduced the thought by writing: “Writing is a sedentary business; it’s easy for many of us to get fat and sluggish. Your brain is attached to the rest of your body. You can’t do your best work when you’re weak or in ill health.”

I’ve always loved this observation, for it captures exactly my own experience when walking. Ehrlich continued: “The human armor of bones rattle, fat rolls, and inside this durable, fleshy prison of mine, I make a beeline toward otherness, lightness, or, maybe like a moth, toward flame.”

QUOTE NOTE: You may have also seen Ehrlich’s observation presented as: “Walking is almost an ambulation of mind.” Here’s what I know about this somewhat confusing situation. In “The Source of a River” essay, published three years later in Islands, The Universe, Home: Essays (1991) Ehrlich offered exactly the same thought as you see above, but this time the phrasing “almost an ambulation” was used. I’ll try to contact Ehrlich for clarification.

QUOTE NOTE II: I haven’t yet heard from Ehrlich on the matter, but I’ve recently discovered that she offered yet another version of the thought in Arctic Heart: A Poem Cycle (1992: “Walking is an ambulation of mind; to walk is/to unbalance oneself: I thrust one foot forward/until I almost fall, then the other foot catches me/as if I were two or none or maybe many.”

Stevens continued: “A composing as the body tires, a stop/To see hepatica, a stop to watch/A definition growing certain and/a wait within that certainty, a rest/In the swags of pine-trees bordering the lake.”

While engaged in the simple physical activity of walking, Thoreau went on to write, “the sources of thought burst forth and fertilize my brain.” He concluded his journal entry this way: “Only while we are in action is the circulation perfect. The writing which consists with habitual sitting is mechanical, wooden, dull to read.”

WANDERING

(includes ROVERS & ROVING; see also DESTINATION and HIKING and JOURNEY and MEANDERING and PILGRIMAGE and STROLLING and TRAVELING and WALKING and WANDERLUST)

Fontaine went on to add: “Women like myself can neither bring happiness into a domestic life, nor (even under the most desirable circumstances) find it there.”

Hampl continued: “Willingness: to hear the tales along the way, to make the casual choices of travel, to acquiesce even to boredom. That’s pilgrimage—a mind full of journey.”

QUOTE NOTE: This has become one of Tolkien’s most popular quotations. It first appeared in an aphorism-laden piece of verse that the character Bilbo used to describe Aragorn: “All that is gold does not glitter;/Not all those who wander are lost;The old that is strong does not wither,/Deep roots are not reached by frost,/From the ashes a fire shall be woken,/A light from the shadows shall spring; /Renewed shall be blade that was broken:/The Crownless again shall be king.”

WANT

(see also DESIRE and DREAMS and LONGING and NEED and WISHES & WISHING)

WAR

(see also AGGRESSION and AIR FORCE and ARMISTICE and ARMY and [CIVIL] WAR and [COLD] WAR and DIPLOMACY and INTELLIGENCE & COUNTERINTELLIGENCE and [The] MILITARY and NATIONALISM and NAVY and NEGOTIATIONS and PATRIOTISM and PEACE and REVOLUTION and REVOLUTIONARY WAR and SOLDIERS and TREATY and VICTORY & DEFEAT and VIETNAM WAR and WWI and WWWII and WAR & PEACE)

QUOTE NOTE: This sentiment—which has achieved the status of a modern proverb—was long thought to have been authored by California Senator Hiram Johnson (1866-1945), supposedly in a U. S. Senate speech just prior to America’s involvement in WWI (in the form: “The first casualty when war comes is truth”). The remark has not been found in the Congressional Record, however, and quotation scholars believe an attribution to Sen. Johnson is incorrect.

In a 1758 essay in The Idler, English man of letters Samuel Johnson offered what looks like the earliest precursor of the sentiment: “Among the calamities of war may be justly numbered the diminution of the love of truth, by the falsehoods which interest dictates, and credulity encourages.” The original author of the actual saying the first casualty of war is truth is unknown, but it was well established by the first decade of the twentieth century. For example, in the Introduction to E. D. Morel’s 1916 book Truth and the War, British politician Philip Snowden wrote: “‘Truth,’ it has been said, ‘is the first casualty of war.’” For more, see this 2011 post by quotation sleuth Barry Popik.

ERROR ALERT: This modern proverb is often attributed to the philosopher Bertrand Russell, but he is most definitely not the original author. The essential nature of the saying (who’s right/who’s left) appeared in the early 1930s, but somewhat similar antecedents began to circulate more than a century earlier (quotation researcher Suzanne Watkins alerted The Quote Investigator to an 1875 who’s right/who’s strongest version).

ERROR ALERT: Numerous quotation anthologies mistakenly say windpipe-splitting art.

ERROR ALERT: This observation, which has never been found in any of Carlyle’s works, is now regarded by scholars as Goldman’s paraphrase of Carlyle’s position on war, originally offered in Sartor Resartus (1833–34). I’ve searched that classic work by Carlyle, and could not find anything even close to Goldman’s summary.

QUOTE NOTE: Churchill made this remark at a summit meeting in Teheran in 1943, just after The Big Three (Churchill, FDR, and Stalin) gave their formal approval to a fake invasion plan submitted by Gen. Dwight Eisenhower, Supreme Commander of Allied Forces. The genuine Normandy Beach invasion plan had already been given the code name “Operation Overlord” and, after Churchill’s remark, the fake plans were named “Operation Bodyguard.”

QUOTE NOTE: The English playwright George Farguhar piggybacked on this famous observation when he gave the following words to a character in his 1698 play Love and a Bottle: “Money is the sinews of love, as of war.”

QUOTE NOTE: This is one of history’s most famous quotations, and this is the way it is most commonly presented in such respected reference works as the Yale Book of Quotations. In The Quote Verifier (2006), however, Ralph Keyes suggests that Clausewitz meant continuation of policy, not politics). For more on the observation, and a sampling of spin-off sayings, go to This Day in Quotes. See also the Zhou Enlai quotation in DIPLOMACY & DIPLOMATS.

QUOTE NOTE: Clausewitz introduced this saying by describing it as “a maxim which should take first place among all causes of victory in the modern art of war.”

Flexner preceded the observation by writing: “Nations have recently been led to borrow billions for war; no nation has ever borrowed largely for education.”

ERROR ALERT: Almost all internet sites and most published quotation anthologies mistakenly present the thought this way: “The tragedy of war is that it uses man’s best to do man’s worst.”

In that same article, Keller offered these other thoughts:

“Every modern war has had its roots in exploitation.”

“The best preparation [for war] is the one that disarms the hostility of other nations and makes friends of them.”

QUOTE NOTE: I’ve tried without success to locate the original source for this observation, which has become one of Dr. King’s most popular quotations. The version above appears—without source information—in an anthology prepared by the Estate of Dr. King, but be aware that the quotation shows up in a number of slightly different ways (the 9/11 Commission report, for example, uses the phrase shaping peaceful tomorrows).

ERROR ALERT: These are Lee’s actual words, according to his biographer, but they are almost always repeated in slightly altered forms, even in scholarly publications. A 1962 edition of The American Scholar, for example, had it this way: “If war were not so terrible, men would love it too much.” Today, you will almost always find it presented in this form: “It is well that war is so terrible; men would love it too much.”

Mannes continued: “Whether in nations or the encounters of race and sex, competition then replaces compassion.”

QUOTE NOTE: Mill, a strong supporter of the Abolitionist cause, introduced this thought by writing: “I am not blind to the possibility that it may require a long war to lower the arrogance and tame the aggressive ambition of the slave-owners.” The full essay may be seen at ”Contest in America”.

QUOTE NOTE: In this pamphlet, one of sixteen Paine wrote during the Revolutionary War, he addressed his words directly to the British general Sir William Howe. He preceded the thought by writing: “If there is a sin superior to every other, it is that of willful and offensive war. Most other sins are circumscribed within narrow limits, that is, the power of one man cannot give them a very general extension, and many kinds of sins have only a mental existence from which no infection arises.”

ERROR ALERT: A very similar version of this observation is commonly misattributed to Plato, even though the legendary Greek philosopher never said or wrote anything like it. In popular misattributions like this, it is usually difficult to identify the original source of the error, but in this case we can. This one can be traced to a 1935 reunion of “Rainbow Division” veterans of The Great War, when U.S. Army Chief of Staff Douglas Macarthur said, “Plato, the wisest of all men, once exclaimed, ‘Only the dead have seen the end of war.’” In 1962, Macarthur made the same claim in a farewell address to West Point cadets, and, as a result of these two speeches, almost all internet sites now mistakenly attribute the observation to Plato.

Tzara began by saying: “Wars are fought for oil wells and coaling stations; for control of the Dardanelles or the Suez Canal; for colonial pickings to buy cheap in and conquered markets to sell dear in.”

Wellesley added: “That’s what I called 'guessing what was at the other side of the hill.'”

[CIVIL] WAR

(see also AGGRESSION and MILITARY and REVOLUTIONARY WAR and VIETNAM WAR and WAR and [COLD] WAR and WAR—OTHER SPECIFIC WARS and WWI and WWWII and WAR & PEACE)

[COLD] WAR

(see also AGGRESSION and MILITARY and REVOLUTIONARY WAR and VIETNAM WAR and WAR and [CIVIL] WAR and WAR—OTHER SPECIFIC WARS and WWI and WWWII and WAR & PEACE)

QUOTE NOTE: Baruch did not coin the term cold war, but his use of the term in this 1947 speech certainly helped to popularize the term. The English writer George Orwell first used the expression in “You and the Atomic Bomb,“ an October 19, 1945 essay in Tribune, a British newspaper . Referring to James Burnham’s predictions of a polarized world confronted with the threat of nuclear warfare, Orwell wrote:

“James Burnham’s theory has been much discussed, but few people have yet considered its ideological implications—that is, the kind of world-view, the kind of beliefs, and the social structure that would probably prevail in a state which was at once unconquerable and in a permanent state of ‘cold war’ with its neighbors.”

Five months later, in March 10, 1946 article in The Observer, Orwell employed the expression a second time, writing: “After the Moscow conference last December, Russia began to make a ‘cold war’ on Britain and the British Empire.”

QUOTE NOTE: Churchill did not coin the term iron curtain (Ethel Snowden, a British politician, used the expression as early as 1920), but his use of the term in this speech immortalized the term. Churchill was referring to the division in Europe that ensued right after WWII. Here’s a fuller passage: “A shadow has fallen upon the scenes so lately lighted by the Allied victory…. From Stettin in the Baltic to Trieste in the Adriatic, an iron curtain has descended across the Continent.”

WAR & PEACE

(see also ARMISTICE and DIPLOMACY and NEGOTIATIONS and MILITARY and NATIONALISM and NAVY and PATRIOTISM and PEACE and VICTORY & DEFEAT and VIETNAM WAR and WAR)

WAR—SPECIFIC WARS

(see also CIVIL WAR and REVOLUTIONARY WAR and VIETNAM WAR and WWI and WWWII)

WASHINGTON, DC

(see also CHICAGO and DESCRIPTIONS—OF PLACES and GOVERNMENT and HOLLYWOOD and LAS VEGAS and LONDON and LOS ANGELES and NEW ORLEANS and NEW YORK CITY and PARIS and POLITICS and POLITICIANSS and SAN FRANCISCO)

(see also AMERICAN CITIES)

Jameson continued: “I don’t meant that these are non-existent in Washington—only that they are subdued to the ruling passion.”

ERROR ALERT: In Portrait of a President (1962), William Manchester quoted JFK without the prefatory words “Somebody once said that,” giving the impression that Kennedy was the author of the saying.

WASHINGTON (State)

(see UNITED STATES OF AMERICA—SPECIFIC STATES)

WATER

(see also [Bottled] WATER and DRINK and RAIN and RIVERS & STREAMS and THIRST and WELLS)

QUOTE NOTE: The boiling point for water is 212 degrees Fahrenheit.

WE & THEY

(includes US & THEM; see also ALIENS and BLAME and FOREIGNERS and [The] OTHER and OUTSIDERS and SCAPEGOATS and STRANGERS and UNDERSTANDING OTHERS)

The poem continues: “And They live over the sea,/While We live over the way,/But—would you believe it?—They look upon We/As only a sort of They!”

Vimes began his thought process this way: “He wanted there to be conspirators. It was much better to imagine men in some smoky room somewhere, made mad and cynical by privilege and power, plotting over the brandy. You had to cling to this sort of image, because if you didn’t then you might have to face the fact that bad things happened because ordinary people, the kind who brushed the dog and told their children bedtime stories, were capable of going out and doing horrible things to other ordinary people.”

WEAKNESS & THE WEAK

(see also HELPLESSNESS and STRENGTH & THE STRONG and STRENGTHS & WEAKNESSES)

Carlyle continued: “Few men have applied more steadfastly to the business of their life, or been more resolutely diligent, than Schiller.”

QUOTE NOTE: Reflecting on what makes for greatness in a man, Emerson went on to write: “When he is pushed, tormented, defeated, he has a chance to learn something; he has been put on his wits, on his manhood; he has gained facts; learns his ignorance; is cured of the insanity of conceit; has got moderation and real skill.”

Kerbouchard introduced the thought by saying: “Up to a point a man’s life is shaped by environment, heredity, and movements and changes in the world about him; then there comes a time when it lies within his grasp to shape the clay of his life into the sort of thing he wishes to be.”

Lord Chesterfield continued: “And if you hint to a man that you think him silly, ignorant, or even ill-bred, or awkward, he will hate you more and longer, than if you tell him plainly, that you think him a rogue. Never yield to that temptation, which to most young people is very strong, of exposing other people’s weaknesses and infirmities.”

In his book, Taleb also wrote: “The weak shows his strength and hides his weaknesses; the magnificent exhibits his weaknesses like ornaments.”

A moment earlier, Stack said: “Nurse one vice in your bosom. Give it the attention it deserves and let your virtues spring up modestly around it. Then you’ll have the miser who’s no liar; and the drunkard who’s the benefactor of the whole city.”

WEALTH

(see also AFFLUENCE and CASH and CURRENCY and DOLLAR and FORTUNE and MILLIONAIRES & BILLIONAIRES and MONEY and POVERTY & THE POOR and PROSPERITY and RICH & RICHES and RICH & POOR TREASURE)

QUOTE NOTE: Carnegie’s essay went on to feature what would ultimately become his most famous observation: “The man who dies…rich dies disgraced.”

Lilsle preceded the thought by writing: “The greatest value of an object lies not in it’s possession, but anticipation.”

ERROR ALERT: Numerous internet sites mistakenly have necessity of the soul.

QUOTE NOTE: This quotation is frequently applied to women marrying wealthy men, but Trollope employed in a description of the 26-year-old Mr. Moffat, who is attempting to select a wife (he is deliberating between two women, the penniless Augusta Gresham, or Martha Dunstable, the heiress to an oil fortune. As a young man of ambition, he makes the latter choice (or, as the narrator of the novel puts it, he “brought himself to resolve that he would at any rate become a candidate for the great prize”).

Twain continued: “As long as one sorely needs a certain additional amount, that man isn’t rich. Seventy times seventy millions can't make him rich as long as his poor heart is breaking for more.”

WEAPONS

(see also AGGRESSION and MILITARY and REVOLUTION and VICTORY and VICTORY & DEFEAT and WAR and WAR & PEACE)

QUOTE NOTE: “Einstein’s monster’s” was Amis’s metaphor for nuclear weapons. In the Introduction Amis also wrote: “Bullets cannot be recalled. They cannot be uninvented. But they can be taken out of the gun.”

WEATHER

(see also CLIMATE and FOG and [NATURAL] DISASTERS and METEOROLOGY and NATURE and RAIN and SEASONS and SNOW & SLEET and WIND)

QUOTE NOTE: Lubbock added: “As Ruskin says, ‘There is really no such thing as bad weather, only different kinds of good weather.’” This appears to be the first appearance of the John Ruskin saying, which went on to become proverbial (see his entry below)

ERROR ALERT: This saying, which appeared for the first time in Lubbock’s book, went on to become a modern proverb. Almost all internet sites present the following erroneous version of the thought: “Sunshine is delicious, rain is refreshing, wind braces us up, and snow is exhilarating; there is no such thing as bad weather, only different kinds of good weather.” The problem originated in Florence Hobart Perin’s Sunlit Days (1915), a book that conflated the words of Ruskin and Lubbock.

WEDDINGS

(see also DIVORCE and HUSBANDS and HUSBANDS & WIVES and LOVE & MARRIAGE and MARRIAGE and WIVES)

In that same column, Brady wrote: “Love may be blind, but marriage can blindside you.”

WEEDS

(see also FLOWERS and FRUITS and GARDENS & GARDENING PLANTS and SEEDS and VEGETABLES)

QUOTE NOTE: Wilcox was likely inspired by James Russell Lowell’s earlier couplet (see above). Here’s the complete first stanza of the Wilcox poem: “A weed is but an unloved flower!/Go dig, and prune, and guide, and wait,/Until it learns its high estate,/And glorifies some bower./A weed is but an unloved flower!”

WEEPING

(see also AGONY and ANGUISH and CRYING and EMOTION and FEELING and GRIEF & GRIEVING and MISERY and SADNESS and SORROW and SUFFERING and TEARS)

ERROR ALERT: This quotation is often mistakenly presented as if it ended with the words and what they might have been.

WEIGHTS & MEASURES METAPHORS

(see also metaphors involving ANIMALS, BASEBALL, BATHING & BATHS, BIRTH, BOXING & PRIZEFIGHTING, CANCER, DANCING, DARKNESS, DEATH, DISEASE, FOOTBALL, FRUIT, GARDENING, HEART, JOURNEYS, LIGHT & LIGHTNESS, MOTHERS, PARTS OF SPEECH, PATHS, PLANTS, PUNCTUATION, RETAIL/WHOLESALE, ROAD, SAILING & NAUTICAL, SUN & MOONS, VEGETABLES, and WEIGHTS & MEASURES)

QUOTE NOTE: The words come as Ali reflects on his attempt to take the heavyweight championship crown from George Foreman in their legendary “Rumble in the Jungle” in Zaire on Oct. 30, 1974. Describing the situation at the beginning of the eighth round, Ali continued: “I know George wants to keep The Champion’s crown. He wants the crown, but is he willing to pay the price? Would he lay out his life? It’s time to go all out.” Ali won the fight by a knockout in the closing seconds of round eight. In the moments after the victory, a reporter clawed his way through the crowd to ask the champ how he did it. Ali described the moment this way:

“I shake my head. I want to go to my dressing room. I don’t want to tell him what George has taught me. That too many victories weaken you. That the defeated can rise up stronger than the victor. But I take nothing away from George. He can still beat any man in the world. Except me.”

Day continued: “An insult strikes to the heart, and rankles there; whilst an apology merely skins over the surface, but never heals the wound.”

ERROR ALERT: There is no evidence Engels ever said such a thing, even though this quotation appears all over the internet and in several respected quotation anthologies. In most cases, no source is given, but when one is provided, the Groves book is cited. Groves was a member of the British Communist Party until he was expelled in 1932 for supporting Trotsky over Stalin. To be fair, Groves didn’t formally quote Engels, but simply asked rhetorically: “And did not wise old Frederick (sic) Engels once say: An ounce of action is worth a ton of theory?” For a discussion of the erroneous Engels attribution, as well as some similar English sayings that preceded it, go to: Ounce of Action

ERROR ALERT: Many respected reference works date the origin of this American proverb as much later, some to 1795. Franklin’s letter to Johnson, however, suggests that it was already familiar by the middle of the century (The Oxford Dictionary of Quotations traces a forerunner saying—prevention is better than cure—to the early seventeenth century). Some works have also mistakenly reported that Franklin offered the observation to the English man of letters, Dr. Samuel Johnson. In fact, he was writing to a similarly named Connecticut clergyman who went on to become president of King’s College, later Columbia College. Franklin’s full letter may be seen at: Ounce of Prevention.

Wesley preceded the observation by warning: “Beware you be not swallowed up in books!”

WEIRDNESS

(see also ECCENTRICITY & ECCENTRICS and INDIVIDUALITY & INDIVIDUALISM and ORIGINALITY and STRANGENESS and UNIQUENESS)

Dowd preceded the thought by writing: “When you’re young, and even at times when you’re older, it’s hard to fathom this: What needs to be nurtured is the stuff that’s different, that sets you apart from the pack, rather than the stuff that helps you blend in.”

WEST VIRGINIA

(see UNITED STATES OF AMERICA—SPECIFIC STATES)

WHIRLWINDS

(including WHIRLS and WHORLS; see also BREEZE and GALE and HURRICANE and TORNADO and TURBULENCE and WIND)

QUOTE NOTE: Richardson, a British meteorologist, was clearly inspired by Jonathan Swift’s famous ad finitum verse on FLEAS. When Richardson originally offered his spin-off construction, he used the spelling whorls, but later editions of his pioneering work used the modern spelling whirls.

WHISKEY

(see also ALCOHOL & ALCOHOLISM and ADDICTS & ADDICTION and ALCOHOL & ALCOHOLISM and BARS, PUBS, & TAVERNS and BEER & ALE and COCKTAILS and DRINKING & DRINKS and DRUGS & RECOVERY and DRUNKENNESS & DRUNKS and LIQUOR and and WINE)

THE WHITE HOUSE

(see also PRESIDENTS & THE PRESIDENCY and WASHINGTON, D.C.)

QUOTE NOTE: Clinton’s remark was almost certainly inspired by a famous observation from President Harry Truman: “The White House is the finest prison in the world.” Later in the year, Clinton offered a slightly altered version to Tim Russert in an appearance on NBC’s Meet the Press (Nov. 7, 1993): “I always say I don’t know whether it’s the finest public housing in America or the crown jewel of the prison system.”

WHOM

(see also GRAMMAR and LANGUAGE USAGE)

WHORES & WHOREHOUSES

(see also HORTICULTURE and PROSTITUTION and SEX)

QUOTE NOTE: Adler, perhaps the most famous brothel owner in American history, continued: “The only difference between them and my girls is that my girls gave a man his money's worth.”

These are the concluding words of the book. O’ Rourke preceded the thought by writing: “Authority has always attracted the lowest elements in the human race. All through history mankind has been bullied by scum. Those who lord it over their fellows and toss commands in every direction and would boss the grass in the meadow about which way to bend in the wind are the most depraved kind of prostitutes. They will submit to any indignity, perform any vile act, do anything to achieve power.”

QUOTE NOTE: This is one of Mrs. Parker’s most famous quotations, inspired by a parlor game in which members of the legendary group of wits challenged each other to use “horticulture” in a sentence. In The New Yale Book of Quotations (2021), Fred Shapiro reported that the first report of the saying came in a March 1, 1935 edition of the Richmond Time-Dispatch, when Walter Winchell referred to Parker’s having made a clever remark using the word horticulture without providing any specific details. Shapiro also reported that a July 1962 article in Horizon magazine reported Parker as saying, “You may lead a whore to culture but you can't make her think.”

WICKEDNESS

(see also BAD and DARKNESS METAPHORS and EVIL and GOOD & BAD and GOOD & EVIL and INNOCENCE and SIN and VICE and VICE & VIRTUE)

This observation has also been translated as: “The wicked are always surprised to discover ability in the just.”

ERROR ALERT: Many internet sites mistakenly present the quotation: “All things truly wicked start from innocence.” The error appears to have originated with Carlos Baker, who offered the mistaken version in his Ernest Hemingway: A Life Story (1969)

WIDOWS & WIDOWERS

(see also DEATH and GRIEF & GRIEVING and HUSBANDS and LOSS and MARRIAGE and SURVIVORS and WIVES)

Hemingway preceded the thought by writing: “All stories, if continued far enough, end in death, and he is no true-story teller who would keep that from you. Especially do all stories of monogamy end in death, and your man who is monogamous while he often lives most happily, dies in the most lonely fashion.”

Mitchard continued: “It doesn’t require the planning, for example, that it takes to become a wife or a mother or any of the other ritual roles of womanhood.”

The full poem contains other memorable lines as well, including “Widow: that great, vacant estate!” To see the full poem, go to: Widow.

WIFE

(see WIVES)

WILL & WILLPOWER

(see also CHOICE and DISCIPLINE and [FREE] WILL] and PURPOSE and RESOLUTION and SELF-CONTROL)

* Be there a will, and wisdom finds a way. George Crabbe, in The Birth of Flattery (1823)

QUOTE NOTE: Crabbe was almost certainly inspired by a William Hazlitt observation that had appeared one year earlier (see his entry below)

* Where there’s a will there’s a way, and where there’s a child there's a will. Marcelene Cox, tweaking the familiar saying (see William Hazlitt below), in a 1950 issue of Ladies’ Home Journal

* Willpower is not some mythical force that we either have or don’t have. Willpower is our decision to use higher-mind thinking instead of lazing around in the clutches of our primal mind. A. B. Curtiss, in Depression is a Choice: Winning the Battle Without Drugs (2001)

Bonnard continued: “It is a teacher’s duty to teach the pupil how to will.”

QUOTE NOTE: According to the The Yale Dictionary of Quotations, this is the earliest appearance in print of an observation that quickly went on to become proverbial. Today, the saying has become one of the most commonly tweaked of all proverbs (you’ll see a number of examples in this section).

The underlying idea about wills and ways, however, preceded Hazlitt by well over a century. In the 1640 book Outlandish Proverbs, George Herbert provided this saying: “To him that will, ways are not wanting.“

[FREE] WILL

(see also CHOICE and DISCIPLINE and PURPOSE and RESOLUTION and SELF-CONTROL and WILL and WILLPOWER)

WILLS

(see INHERITANCE)

WIMPS

(see also BRAVERY and COURAGE and COURAGE & COWARDICE and COWARDICE and DANGER and DARING and FEAR and RISK & RISK-TAKING and VALOR)

WIND

(see also BREEZE and CYCLONE and GALE and TYPHOON and WATER and WHIRLWIND and WINDMILL)

Erlich continued: “Though it was water that initially shaped the state, wind is the meticulous gardener, raising dust and pruning the sage.”

WINE

(see also ALCOHOL and BARS, PUBS, & TAVERNS and BEER & ALE and CHAMPAGNE and COCKTAILS and DRINKING & DRINKS and LIQUOR–DISTILLED BEVERAGES)

QUOTE NOTE: In her memoir—which is also, in many ways, an affectionate biography of her father—Fadiman also included this other wine observation from her dad: “I know no other liquid that, placed in the mouth, forces one to think.”

QUOTE NOTE: Franklin wrote the letter while serving as Ambassador to France (1779-85). The observation is the source of a popular modern saying that is commonly, but mistakenly, attributed to Franklin: “Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.”

ERROR ALERT: Most internet sites mistakenly attribute this observation to the English writer Henry Fielding (1707-54). In 1824, Thomas Fielding (no relation) included the saying in his Select Proverbs of All Nations. When subsequent reference works included the proverb, they followed the common practice of the time by attributing it simply to “Fielding.” Most readers naturally assumed that Henry Fielding was the author, and thus began his association with an observation he never authored. The error continues to the present day.

QUOTE NOTE: In vino veritas (literally, “In wine, truth”) may be history’s most famous Latin saying, already an established proverb when Plato identified it as such in his Symposium, written in the early decades of the 4th century B.C.

WINNING

(includes WINNERS and WINS and WIN-WIN & WIN-LOSE; see also CONTEST and COMPETITION and DEFEAT and DISPUTE and FAILURE and SUCCESS and VICTORY and LOSS [as in DEFEAT] and TRIUMPH and WINNING & LOSING)

QUOTE NOTE: The words come as Ali reflects on his attempt to take the heavyweight championship crown from George Foreman in their legendary “Rumble in the Jungle” in Zaire on Oct. 30, 1974. Describing the situation at the beginning of the eighth round, Ali continued: “I know George wants to keep The Champion’s crown. He wants the crown, but is he willing to pay the price? Would he lay out his life? It’s time to go all out.” Ali won the fight by a knockout in the closing seconds of round eight. In the moments after the victory, a reporter clawed his way through the crowd to ask the champ how he did it. Ali described the moment this way:

“I shake my head. I want to go to my dressing room. I don’t want to tell him what George has taught me. That too many victories weaken you. That the defeated can rise up stronger than the victor. But I take nothing away from George. He can still beat any man in the world. Except me.”

Hope added: “Hares have no time to read. They are too busy winning the game.”

Christensen continued: “Because what happens is that we learn over the years that sometimes it’s easier not to try, than to risk failing.”

Dorinda was thinking about another character in the book, Geneva Ellgood. Just prior to this thought, she said to a friend about Geneva: “She needed love way too much ever to find it.”

ERROR ALERT: Lombardi is often quoted as saying, “Winning isn’t everything; it’s the only thing,” but he denied ever making the remark. The saying was first offered by “Red” Sanders, the UCLA football coach who was quoted in a 1955 Sports Illustrated article this way: “Sure, winning isn’t everything,” he once declared. “It’s the only thing.”),

Roosevelt preceded the thought by writing: “Perhaps there is no more important component of character than steadfast resolution.” The full article, still worth reading more than a century later, may be found at: Character and Success.

WINNING & LOSING

(includes WINNERS & LOSERS; see also CONTEST and COMPETITION and DEFEAT and FAILURE and SUCCESS and VICTORY and LOSS [as in DEFEAT] and TRIUMPH and WINNING)

QUOTE NOTE: Brett was piggybacking on an observation commonly attributed to Michigan State football coach Duffy Daugherty, but originally offered by the U. S. Naval Academy football coach Eddie Erdelatz (see his entry in TIE)

ERROR ALERT: Numerous internet sites mistakenly present the final words as “knows neither victory nor defeat.”

WINTER

(see also FALL/AUTUMN and MONTHS OF THE YEAR and SEASONS and SPRING and SNOW and SUMMER and SUMMER METAPHORS)

QUOTE NOTE: Feeling proof is a British idiom that means “armed against,” and the quotation in Adams’ classic children’s novel reminds of of an inescapable truth about human life—when people and animals are fully prepared and adequately protected, they can not only survive the coldest days of winter, they can come close to thriving in them. In the book, the narrator continued: “For them there is no food problem. They have fires and warm clothes. The winter cannot hurt them and therefore increases their sense of cleverness and security.”

And then, after some additional words on the subject, the narrator concluded: “For rabbits, winter remains what it was for men in the Middle Ages—hard, but bearable by the resourceful and not altogether without compensations.”

Stout continued: “And yet in spring, summer and fall people sort of have an open season on each other; only in the winter, in the country, can you have longer, quiet stretches when you can savor belonging to yourself.”

Thoreau continued: “We are accustomed to hear this king described as a rude and boisterous tyrant; but with the gentleness of a lover he adorns the tresses of Summer.”

WINTER METAPHORS

WISCONSIN

(see UNITED STATES OF AMERICA—SPECIFIC STATES)

WISDOM & THE WISE

(see also INTELLIGENCE and FOLLY and LEARNING and KNOWLEDGE and KNOWLEDGE & WISDOM)

Albom continued: “If you are lucky enough to find your way to such teachers, you will always find your way back. Sometimes it is only in your head. Sometimes it is right alongside their beds.”

Allen continued: “It is the result of long and patient effort in self-control. Its presence is an indication of ripened experience, and of a more than ordinary knowledge of the laws and operations of thought.”

QUOTATION CAUTION: This quotation has enjoyed popular currency since it appeared in Ballou’s impressive quotation anthology, but it does not appear in Lacon’s classic 1820 work Lacon: Or, Many Things in Few Words.

A bit earlier, Cousins had written: “A human being fashions his consequences as surely as he fashions his goods or his dwelling. Nothing that he says, thinks, or does is without consequences. In The Celebration of Life, published posthumously in 1991: this thought was presented this way: “Wisdom consists of the anticipation of consequences. A human being fashions his consequences as surely as he fashions his goods or his dwelling. Nothing that he says, thinks or does is without consequences.”

A bit earlier in the same work, Cowper offered this other comparison of knowledge and wisdom: “Knowledge dwells/in heads replete with thoughts of other men,/Wisdom in minds attentive to their own.”

QUOTE NOTE: Marie de Gournay was an aspiring young intellectual—and an early feminist—when, at age 23, she first met Montaigne in 1588 (he was 55 and already famous for his Essais, the first volume of which appeared in 1580). Women were denied formal education at the time, but de Gournay was fluent in both Latin and Greek, and already well acquainted with the classical writers of antiquity. Montaigne greatly admired her, clearly viewed her as a protégé, and even described “a fatherly love” for her in one of his essays (although he rendered her name as Marie Gournay le Jars). After Montaigne’s death in 1592, his widow made the young woman a literary executor. In 1595, she put together the first posthumous edition of Montaigne’s essays, introduced by a lengthy Preface in praise of the man and his works.

QUOTE NOTE: The full passage is: “Never forget that until the day when God shall deign to reveal the future to man, all human wisdom is summed up in these two words—Wait and Hope.”

Hoffer continued: “We are essentially apart from the world; it bursts into our consciousness only when it sinks its teeth and nails into us.”

QUOTE NOTE: Most internet sites and quotation anthologies present only the concluding phrase: “Honesty is the first chapter in the book of wisdom.”

Proust continued: “The lives that you admire, the attitudes that seem noble to you, have not been shaped by a father or a schoolmaster, they have sprung from very different beginnings, having been influenced by everything evil or commonplace that prevailed round about them. They represent a struggle and a victory.”

WISHES & WISHING

(see also DESIRES and DAYDREAMS and FANTASIES and LONGING and MOTIVATION and NEEDS and PRAYER and WANTS and WILL & WILLPOWER)

QUOTE NOTE: The moral of this Aesop fable is one of the earliest expressions of one of history’s grand oxymoronic themes. The essential idea has been echoed countess times over the centuries, including the modern proverb: “Be careful what you wish for, it might come true.” A century after Aesop. the Greek writer Heraclitus expressed the sentiment this way: “It would not be better if things happened to men just as they wish.” You’ll also see several more examples later in this section.

Auden continued: “A wish, therefore, is either innocent and frivolous, a kind of play, or a serious expression of guilt and despair.”

ERROR ALERT: Almost all internet sites mistakenly present the observation as if it were phrased “Be careful what you set your heart upon—for it will surely be yours,” with the suggestion that it’s a direct Baldwin observation rather than a sentiment he heard from someone else.

QUOTE NOTE: This has become one of Bowen’s most popular quotations, and this is the way it is almost always presented on internet sites and in quotation anthologies. In the book, however, the sixteen-year-old Portia was actually reporting something said by a young man she was infatuated with: “He says that when you love someone all your saved-up wishes start coming out.” For the fuller portion of Portia’s diary that led up to this observation, see Janet Hu’s article on Bowen in a 2010 issue of the online magazine This Recording.

ERROR ALERT: All over the internet, thIs observation is mistakenly attributed to the Dalai Lama.

QUOTE NOTE: in Greek Thinkers: A History of Ancient Philosophy (1906), Theodor Gompers translated the fragment this way: “It would not be better for mankind if they were given their desires.”

QUOTE NOTE: George Bernard Shaw was clearly inspired by Wilde’s oxymoronic creation when he gave a very similar remark to the character Mendoza in Man and Superman (1903): “There are two tragedies in life. One is to lose your heart’s desire. The other is to gain it.”

WIT

(see also CLEVERNESS and COMEDY & COMEDIANS and HUMOR and JOKES and LAUGHTER and LEVITY and MIRTH and PARODY & PARODISTS and PUNS and REPARTEE and RETORTS and SARCASM and SATIRE & SATIRISTS and WITS and WIT & HUMOR and WITTICISMS)

ERROR ALERT: A number of respected anthologies mistakenly present this quotation as: Wit is a pernicious thing when it is not tempered with virtue and humanity.

QUOTE NOTE: This is the way the quotation typically appears, but I have always preferred an earlier translation: “Wit is well-bred insolence.”

Chesterton continued: “All honest people saw the point of Mark Twain’s wit. Not a few dishonest people felt it.”

QUOTE NOTE: This looks like the earliest version of a popular Coward observation, which you will find presented in a variety of slightly different ways in books and internet sites. Graham Payn, for example, in his My Life with Noël Coward (1994) presents this interesting version: “Wit is like caviar. It should be served in small, elegant portions and not splodged around like marmalade!”

QUOTE NOTE: This is the English rendition of Diderot’s famous coinage—l’esprit de l’escalier in the original—for the witty retorts that spring to mind when one is no longer in the room where an offense occurred, and often as one is exiting down the staircase.

QUOTE NOTE: Holt, who was prone to responding in anger to insults and injuries, was planning his next move against Mr. Johnson, who had tricked him. He knew a physical altercation would be inappropriate and unsatisfying, thinking, “Blows are sarcasms turned stupid.” Some kind of wit, he concludes, would be required to defeat his foe.

QUOTE NOTE: Emerson was writing when wit was used to mean intelligence, and it is clear from his writing that he viewed intelligence as always welcome and a trait that superseded class and social status.

QUOTE NOTE: This is a beautiful metaphor in its own right, but it was originally the first portion of the following tricolon: “Wit is the lightning of the mind, reason the sunshine, and reflection the moonlight.”

Herbert went on to write: “Many affecting wit beyond their power,/Have got to be a dear fool for an hour.”

QUOTE NOTE: This is how the quotation is almost always presented, but it originally appeared in a larger description about a London luncheon attended by a number of artists and writers. About one of guests, the narrator wrote: “Mrs. Jay, aware that impropriety is the soul of wit, made observations in tones hardly above a whisper that might well have tinged the snowy tablecloth with as rosy hue.” The meaning of the final portion of the passage is that tasteless remarks delivered with flair might even embarrass a white tablecloth. The full original Shakespeare quotation may be seen in BREVITY. See also the Dorothy Parker entry in LINGERIE.

QUOTE NOTE: This observation was the likely inspiration for a popular Mark Twain thought about wit being the marriage of ideas (see below)

ERROR ALERT: On almost all internet sites, this is presented as a prose observation, not as a piece of verse.

QUOTE NOTE: Twain wasn’t quoting a specific person so much as he was trying to recall a saying he admired; in doing so, he created one of his most popular quotations. The thought he was trying to bring to memory was almost certainly an 1803 observation from Sydney Smith, seen above.

QUOTE NOTE: Vidal was talking about the wit of the satirist, as exemplified in the work of Evelyn Waugh. He began his review by writing: “A satirist is a man profoundly revolted by the society in which he lives. His rage takes the form of wit, ridicule, mockery.”

Wagner preceded the line by writing: “If evolution was worth its salt, by now it should’ve evolved something better than survival of the fittest.”

WITS

(see also CLEVERNESS and COMEDY & COMEDIANS and HUMOR and JOKES and LAUGHTER and LEVITY and MIRTH and PARODY & PARODISTS and PUNS and REPARTEE and RETORTS and SARCASM and SATIRE & SATIRISTS and WIT and WIT & HUMOR and WITTICISMS)

QUOTE NOTE: This is one of Swift's most quotable observations, appearing in his first major work, a brilliant satire in which three brothers adrift in a tub represent three branches of European Christianity. What is less well known is how Swift continued the thought: “Besides, those whose teeth are too rotten to bite are best of all others qualified to revenge that defect with their breath.”

WIT & HUMOR

(see also COMEDY & COMEDIANS and HUMOR and JOKES and LAUGHTER and LEVITY and MIRTH and PARODY & PARODISTS and SATIRE & SATIRISTS and WIT)

QUOTE NOTE: When Billings first presented the thought in Everybody’s Friend (1874), he expressed it in his distinctive phonetic dialect: “Wit makes yu think, humor makes yu laff.”

The remark was introduced by this thought: “It is a curious fact, but a fact it is, that your witty people are the most hard-hearted in the world. The truth is, fancy destroys feeling. The quick eye to the ridiculous turns every thing to the absurd side; and the neat sentence, the lively allusion, and the odd simile, invest what they touch with something of their own buoyant nature.”

Noonan continued: “John Kennedy had wit, and so did Lincoln, who also had abundant humor; Reagan was mostly humor.”

Repplier continued: “Wit can be expressed only in language; humor can be developed sufficiently in situation.”

WITTICISMS

(see also COMEDY & COMEDIANS and HUMOR and JOKES and LAUGHTER and LEVITY and MIRTH and PARODY & PARODISTS and PUNS and REPARTEE and RETORTS and SARCASM and SATIRE & SATIRISTS and WIT and WIT & HUMOR)

WIVES

(includes HOUSEWIFE & HOUSEWIVES and WIFE; see also DIVORCE and FAMILY and FATHERS and HUSBANDS and HUSBANDS & WIVES and LOVE and MARRIAGE and PARENTS and WEDDINGS)

QUOTE NOTE: This was the concluding line of an essay that began with Syfer thinking, “While I was ironing one evening, it suddenly occurred to me that I, too, would like to have a wife.” And then, after ticking off dozens of services that wives routinely perform, she arrives at the concluding line.

WOMEN—DESCRIBED BY WOMEN

(includes WOMAN; see also LADIES and MALE-FEMALE DYNAMICS and MAN and MEN & WOMEN and MEN—DESCRIBED BY MEN and MEN-DESCRIBED BY WOMEN and SEXISM & SEXIST STATEMENTS and WOMEN—DESCRIBED BY MEN)

QUOTE NOTE: Here, Rich tweaks a famous line from John Donne's “For Whom the Bell Tolls” (to be seen in MANKIND}

WOMEN—DESCRIBED BY MEN

(includes WOMAN; see also LADIES and MALE-FEMALE DYNAMICS and MAN and MEN & WOMEN and MEN—DESCRIBED BY MEN and MEN-DESCRIBED BY WOMEN and SEXISM & SEXIST STATEMENTS and WOMEN—DESCRIBED BY WOMEN)

QUOTE NOTE: This is the way that Balzac's famous observation is usually presented, and it is one of the most popular observations about male clumsiness in their intimate relations with women. The popular version of the sentiment appears to be an abridgment of Balzac's original words. Here's his fuller thought: “Woman is a delicious instrument of pleasure, but it is necessary to know its quivering strings, study the pose of it, its timid keyboard, the changing and capricious fingering. How many orangs—men, I mean, marry without knowing what a woman is!”

QUOTE NOTE: This is the original phrasing of the sentiment that evolved into the modern proverb, “Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned” (some versions of the proverb replace hath with has, and still others replace scorned with spurned). The saying has been tweaked and parodied many times (see the Connolly entry below as well as the entries by Friedman in BUREAUCRACY & BUREAUCRATS and Bristol in FANATICISM & FANATICS)

QUOTE NOTE: This observation, made over a half century before the modern Women’s Movement, is so amazingly prescient that only one conclusion is warranted: if ever a man deserved to be called am “early feminist,” it would have to be Rilke.

WONDER

(see also AWARENESS and AWE and CURIOSITY and KNOWLEDGE and MYSTERY)

QUOTE NOTE: This thought came to Ackerman when she witnessed a rare sight while snorkeling in a sea cave near the island of Niihau in Hawaii. Here’s how she described the experience: “I am watching monk seals mate, I tell myself twice, as a complete sentence, because it is an astoundingly rare event to behold. The two other recorded sightings were vague and incomplete, and I feel lucky indeed.”

About the great world of wonder that lies within, Browne added: “There is all Africa and her prodigies in us.”

Dawkins continued: “It is truly one of the things that make life worth living and it does so, if anything, more effectively if it convinces us that the time we have for living is quite finite.”

QUOTE NOTE: This thought was preceded by one of Einstein’s most popular quotations: “The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the fundamental emotion that stands at the cradle of true art and true science.” Both passages have been translated in varying ways over the years, but these are the versions presented in The New Quotable Einstein (2005), edited by Alice Calaprice.

QUOTE NOTE: Emerson, who was intimately familiar with the works of Francis Bacon, might have been inspired by his notion that wonder is the seed of knowledge, seen in the Bacon entry above,

Hampl added: “And something terrible resides at the heart of wonder. Celebration is social, amenable. Wonder has a chaotic splendor. It moves into experience rather than into judgement. It zooms headlong into the act of perception.”

WORDS

(see also LANGUAGE and SPEECH & SPEAKING and TALK & TALKING and WORDS & DEEDS and WRITERS and WRITING)

For this reason, Adams concluded chiastically: “No one means all he says, and yet very few say all they mean.” For more on the literary device of chiasmus and the structure of chiastic quotations, go to: What is Chiasmus?

Aitchison added: “By the age of five, most English-speaking children can actively use around 3,000 words, and more are added fast…20,000 around the age of thirteen, and to 50,000 or more by the age of twenty.”

ERROR ALERT: This is the way the quotation originally appears, the conclusion to a passage about contrasting sexual triggers in men and women. In a number of popular quotation anthologies, and on hundreds of internet sites, the quotation is mistakenly presented this way: “For women, the best aphrodisiacs are words. The G-spot is in the ears. He who looks for it below there is wasting his time.”

QHOTE NOTE: I grew suspicious when I first encountered the erroneous quotation, believing Allende would have more likely written best aphrodisiac is words rather than best aphrodisiacs are words. When I tracked down the original quotation, I discovered the widely-quoted version is also wrong in several other ways, appearing to be a paraphrase of Allende’s original thought rather than a direct quotation. I present her full original thought below. In contrast to men, who primarily respond to a visual stimulus, Allende writes:

“We women have a better developed sense of the ridiculous, and besides, our sensuality is tied to our imagination and our auditory nerves. It may be that the only way we will listen is if someone whispers in our ear. The G spot is in the ears, and anyone who goofs around looking for it farther down is wasting his time and ours. Professional lovers, and I am referring not just to lotharios like Casanova, Valentino, and Julio Iglesias, but to the quantities of men who collect amorous conquests to prove their virility with quantity—since quality—is a question of luck—know that with women the best aphrodisiac is words.”

Later in the book, Bachelard expanded on the thought, writing: “The words of the world want to make sentences.”

This is the Revised Standard Version of the passage; the King James Version has it this way: “A word fitly spoken is like apples of gold in pictures of silver.”

Bohr continued: “We must strive continually to extend the scope of our description, but in such a way that our messages do not thereby lose their objective or unambiguous character.”

QUOTE NOTE: In a Time magazine review of the book (“Word Tamer,” Feb. 5, 1979), Gerald Clarke picked up on Brenan’s circus trainer metaphor and ended his piece by writing: “The words may jump and snarl, snap and bite when Brenan sits down at his own desk. But when they march onto his page, they almost always perform marvelous and original tricks.”

QUOTE NOTE: In a section addressed “To the Learned Reader,” Bunyan was defending his simple and direct writing style. Even though his writing was “empty of the language of the learned,” he argued that it would be a mistake to regard it as the work of an unintelligent person.

Caroline continued: “A skillful disputant knows well how to take advantage of this confusion, and sometimes endeavors to create it.”

QUOTE NOTE: Playing the role of Martin Luther, Fiennes was describing his difficulty in translating the Latin version of the New Testament into the German language.

Garg, the man behind the immensely popular A.Word.A.Day daily e-blast, added: “Like a fencer with a whole supply of moves, feints, and parries, a person with a large and varied vocabulary at her command can find just the right word for the occasion.”

QUOTE NOTE: It was not words but language that was called “fossil poetry.” See the Ralph Waldo Emerson entry in LANGUAGE

ERROR ALERT: In 1977, The Forbes Book of Business Quotations attributed a similar remark to Leo Rosten: “Words must surely be counted among the most powerful drugs man ever invented.” Kipling is clearly the original author of the sentiment.

Jeane J. Kirkpatrick, “Israel as Scapegoat,” in address to Anti-Defamation League, Palm Beach, Florida (Feb. 11, 1982)

QUOTE NOTE: Klemperer’s work was originally published in 1946 with a half-German, half Latin title: LTI – Lingua Tertii Imperii: Notizbuch eines Philologen (translated as The Language of the Third Reich: A Philologist’s Notebook). He prefaced the thought above with this intriguing observation about how the Nazis came to exert such control over German citizens:

“The most powerful influence was exerted neither by individual speeches nor by articles or flyers, posters or flags; it was not achieved by things which one had to absorb by conscious thought or conscious emotions. Instead Nazism permeated the flesh and blood of the people through single words, idioms and sentence structures which were imposed on them in a million repetitions and taken on board mechanically and unconsciously.”

For more on the man and his work, go to: Victor Klemperer.

Lederer continued: “Like flint tools and weaving, each new word is a human invention, spoken or written for the very first time by a particular human being at a particular moment. We human beings are the word makers, and it is we who decide what words mean and when their meanings change.”

Lederer continued: “They may be newly born and just taking their place in the world, like selfie, vape, and binge watching. Or they may repose in the tomb of history, as leechcraft, the Anglo-Saxon word for the practice of medicine, and murfles, a long defunct word for freckles or pimples.” The full column may be seen at U-T San Diego.

ERROR ALERT: The final word of the title of the poem and the book is often mistakenly rendered as Seeds, even in such respected reference works as The Yale Book of Quotations (2006). See the book at Sword Blades and Poppy Seed (Scroll down to page three to see the poem)

QUOTE NOTE: In offering the thought, Lydon used an intriguing ocean metaphor he learned from his high school science teacher. Just as the energy of an ocean wave is not in the water, but something that flows through it, Lydon argued that “the energy of writing is not in the words; the energy of writing flows through the words.” His entire essay may be seen at Visual Thesaurus.

QUOTE NOTE: I’ve also seen the quotation translated this way: “To reason with a poor language is like using a pair of scales with inaccurate weights.” Maurois began by writing that there are no disputes in algebra because all terms are precisely defined. In most human discourse, by contrast, language is imprecise. He wrote: “The words used in speaking about emotions, about the conduct of government, are vague words which may be employed in the same argument with several different meanings.”

ERROR ALERT: The observation is commonly presented as if it read: words are a commodity in which there is never any slump. In the book, Morley went on to write: “Talk is the greatest industry, and all human beings move in clouds of it—not merely their own, but in the rumors and representations of others, to which they are sometimes painfully sensitive.”

ERROR ALERT: In numerous quotation anthologies and internet sites—including many Ayn Rand tribute sites—this quotation is wrongly presented as: Words are a lens to focus one’s mind.

Two and one-half centuries later, in his famous “Politics and the English Language” essay (Horizon magazine, April, 1946), George Orwell offered another memorable analogy regarding the use of language and the ink-squirting fish: “The great enemy of clear language is insincerity. When there is a gap between one’s real and one’s declared aims, one turns as it were instinctively to long words and exhausted idioms, like a cuttlefish squirting out ink.”

Rohn introduced the thought by writing: “Words enable us to transfer our thoughts from inside our own mind into the mind of another. They have the power to alter history, to describe the past, and to bring meaning and substance to the present.”

QUOTE NOTE: The king has just reduced the the term of Bolingbroke’s banishment. He continued: “Four lagging winters and four wanton springs/End in a word; such is the breath of kings.”

QUOTATION CAUTION: So far, this is the earliest appearance I’ve been able to find of this popular observation on the importance of brevity in writing and speaking. Despite years of sleuthing by quotation researchers, the passage has not been found in Southey’s works (I've also recently searched all four volumes of Southey’s Common-Place books without success). The quotation has also been occasionally attributed to John Dryden, but never with any supporting evidence.

QUOTE NOTE: This is how the quotation is typically presented, but it was originally part of a larger thought about grieving—in this case, Tennyson’s grief over the loss of his great and dear friend Arthur Henry Hallam, who died suddenly and unexpectedly of a cerebral hemorrhage in 1833. Here’s the complete quatrain: “I sometimes hold it half a sin/To put in words the grief I feel;/For words, like Nature, half reveal/And half conceal the Soul within.

QUOTE NOTE: In that same manifesto, Thomas described a number of other things he attempted to do to words in addition to beating them into submission (see his entry in the WRITERS—ON THEMSELVES section).

QUOTE NOTE: Twain offered this observation in a number of different ways over the years, and this is the version that has stood the test of time. Twain candidly admitted that the lightning/lightning bug sentiment was not his own creation, however, but one he borrowed from the humorist Josh Billings. In Mark Twain Speaking (1976), editor Paul Fatout wrote that Twain credited Billings in a Nov. 30, 1901 speech at the annual dinner of the St. Andrew’s Society in Manhattan, saying: “Josh Billings defined the difference between humor and wit as that between the lightning bug and the lightning.” However, Billings originally phrased it somewhat differently. In a 1871 Old Farmers Aliminax entry, he was contrasting vivacity, and not humor, with wit, and he originally presented the observation in his characteristic dialect style: “Don't mistake vivacity for wit, thare iz about az mutch difference az thare iz between lightning and a lightning bug.”

ERROR ALERT: Almost all internet sites, including Wikiquote, mistakenly present the quotation this way. What Wiesel actually wrote in Legends of Our Time (1968) was: “Some writings could sometimes, in moments of grace, attain the quality of deeds.

Yeats continued: “Poets are the policeman of language, they are always arresting those old reprobates the words.”

WORDS & DEEDS

(see also LANGUAGE and SPEECH & SPEAKING and TALK & TALKING and WORDS and WRITERS and WRITING)

ERROR ALERT: Almost all internet sites, including Wikiquote, mistakenly present the quotation this way. What Wiesel actually wrote in Legends of Our Time (1968) was: “Some writings could sometimes, in moments of grace, attain the quality of deeds.

WORK

(see also AVOCATION and CALLING and CAREER and EMPLOYMENT and JOB and LABOR and OCCUPATION and PLAY and PROFESSION and REST and [Job] TITLE and UNEMPLOYMENT and VACATION and VOCATION and [Hard] WORK and WORK & PLAY)

QUOTE NOTE: For the backstory of this quotation, see the Alcott entry in WORK & PLAY.

And we do this, Bernstein added, “With far greater intensity than we bring work home at night.”

Buechner continued: “If you express the best you have in you in your work, it is more than just the best you have in you that you are expressing.”

People in the first class “are in the majority,” said Churchill, “But Fortune’s favored children belong to the second class. Their life is a natural harmony. For them the working hours are never long enough. Each day is a holiday, and ordinary holidays when they come are grudged as enforced interruptions in an absorbing vocation.”

Marlow added: “Your own reality—for yourself, not for others—what no other man can ever know.”

QUOTE NOTE: This was a signature saying for Coward, offered in slightly varying ways on different occasions. Sheridan Morley’s The Quotable Noël Coward (1999) has: “Work is always so much more fun than fun.”

In that same essay, Emerson wrote: “Every man’s task is his life-preserver.”

Gibran continued: “And if you cannot work with love but only with distaste, it is better that you should leave your work and sit at the gate of the temple and take alms of those who work with joy.”

Jerome continued: “There is no fun in doing nothing when you have nothing to do. Wasting time is merely an occupation then. and a most exhausting one. Idleness, like kisses, to be sweet must be stolen.”

QUOTE NOTE: In 1958, the essay was reprinted along with other essays in Parkinson’s Law, or The Pursuit of Progress. When the book became a surprise bestseller, the saying was immortalized in popular culture as Parkinson’s Law. The metaphorical conceit of expressing a bureaucratic phenomenon in a scientific-like formula (we typically think of a gas expanding, for example) was so well received that Parkinson capitalized on his success by propounding corollaries in a number of sequels (his Second Law was: “Expenditure rises to meet income”). Parkinson’s work fit in nicely with the era’s developing interest in Murphy’s Law (“If anything can go wrong, it will”), and both formulations inspired countless corollaries, tweaks, and spin-offs. For more, go to Parkinson’s Law.

QUOTE NOTE: This observation has also been translated this way: “The virtuous heart, like the body, becomes strong and healthy more by labor than by nourishment.”

ERROR ALERT: Almost all internet sites—and a number of popular quotation anthologies—mistakenly present this observations as if it were phrased: “Painting is just another way of keeping a diary.”

QUOTE NOTE: Roosevelt, who was familiar with the writings of Ralph Waldo Emerson, might have been inspired by an observation from Emerson’s “Considerations by the Way” essay in The Conduct of Life (1860), which appears above.

QUOTE NOTE: This was the way Rossetti began her entry for January 5th. A bit later, she added: “A bad beginning may be retrieved and a good ending achieved. No beginning, no ending.”

ERROR ALERT: This is an enormously popular sentiment, but only rarely presented accurately. Almost all quotation anthologies—and scores of books and magazine articles that I’ve checked—mistakenly have loves instead of love, and his trade instead of any trade. Stevenson wrote labour in the original article, a usage retained in British anthologies, but changed to labor in American ones.

The passage is also commonly translated: “Work saves us from three great evils: boredom, vice, and need.”

QUOTE NOTE: The underlying sentiment is not original to Williams; since the late 1960s, Work is a Four-Letter Word was a popular bumper sticker in America (inspired, according to some sources, by a comment from Abbie Hoffman, a founder of the so-called Yippie counter-cultural movement)

Yang, a successful American entrepreneur and unsuccessful candidate for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination, introduced the thought by writing: “Whether work is good for humans depends on your point of view. We don’t like it and we’re almost certainly getting too much of it. But we don’t know what to do with ourselves without it.”

[Hard] WORK

(see also EMPLOYMENT and JOB and LABOR and OCCUPATION and PLAY and PROFESSION and REST and VOCATION and WORK and WORK & PLAY)

QUOTE NOTE: This is a variation on an observation that has become something a signature line for Edison, to be found in Genius.

Marquez added: “Writing something is almost as hard as making a table. With both you are working with reality, a material as hard as wood. Both are full of tricks and techniques.”

L’Engle preceded the thought by writing: “A life lived in chaos is an impossibility for the artist. No matter how unstructured may seem the painter’s garret in Paris or the poet’s pad in Greenwich Village, the artist must have some kind of order or he will produce a very small body of work.”

QUOTE NOTE: Roosevelt, who was familiar with the writings of Ralph Waldo Emerson, might have been inspired by an observation from Emerson’s “Considerations by the Way” essay in The Conduct of Life (1860), which appears above.

Zafon added: “I think most writers enjoy the feeling of having written something, rather than the process of writing it.”

WORK & PLAY

(see also AVOCATION and CALLING and CAREER and EMPLOYMENT and LABOR and OCCUPATION and PLAY and PROFESSION and REST and UNEMPLOYMENT and VACATION and VOCATION and WORK)

QUOTE NOTE: This piece of advice—from the “Experiment” chapter—comes a week after Mrs. March permitted her girls to play all week, with no chores at all. At the beginning of the experiment, she predicted: “I think by Saturday night you will find that all play and no work is as bad as all work and no play.” The girls reject this notion, of course, thinking (in Meg’s words) “It will be delicious, I’m sure.” By week’s end, Mrs. March’s prediction is confirmed and the girls have learned a valuable life lesson. As the all-play-and-no-work week comes to an end, Mrs. March offers yet another observation that has gone on to achieve a kind of quotation immortality:

“Let me advise you to take up your little burdens again; for though they seem heavy sometimes, they are good for us, and lighten as we learn to carry them. Work is wholesome. And there is plenty for every one; it keeps us from ennui and mischief, is good for health and spirits, and gives us a sense of power and independence better than money or fashion.”

QUOTE NOTE: The book was published in America under the title: Amid These Storms: Thoughts and Adventures.

QUOTE NOTE: This was a signature saying for Coward, offered in slightly varying ways on different occasions. Sheridan Morley’s The Quotable Noël Coward (1999) has: “Work is always so much more fun than fun.”

Santayana continued: “To play with nature and make it decorative, to play with the overtones of life and make them delightful, is a sort of art. It is the ultimate, the most artistic sort of art.”

[Good] WORKS

(see also ACTION and CHARITY and [Doing] GOOD and GOODNESS and ETHICS and PHILANTHROPISTS & PHILANTHROPY and RELIGION and VIRTUE)

WORLD

(see also UNIVERSE)

ERROR ALERT: This quotation is commonly attributed to St. Augustine, but nothing like it has ever been found in his writings.

Dirda added: “Those journeys, with their serendipitous discoveries and misguided side trips, allow us to probe our characters, indulge our passions and prejudices, and finally choose books for which we possess a real affinity.”

Hunt continued: “To be sensible of the truth of only one of these, is to know the truth but by halves.”

A moment later, Keats posed a rhetorical question that went on to become one of his most frequently quoted lines: “Do you not see how necessary a World of Pains and troubles is to school an Intelligence and make it a soul?”

QUOTE NOTE: On the same subject, Pirsig the following thought in his 1974 classic Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance: “We take a handful of sand from the endless landscape of awareness around us and call that handful of sand the world.”

In an age when the great masses were illiterate, Emblem books provided illustrations (Quarles even provided a memorable definition of the term: “An emblem is but a silent parable”). In the next verse, Quarles wrote: “But if a Ray of Light divine/His wand’ring Step directs,/The Way unerringly he’ll find,/And the Abode he seeks.” To see how Quarles visually rendered the theme, go to Quarles’s Labyrinth

QUOTE NOTE: This is one of literary history’s most famous passages. Shakespeare might have expressed the thought in a formal analogy (people are to the world as actors are to a stage), but he went with a metaphor instead. After describing the world as a stage he stays true to the root sense of the word metaphor by carrying the metaphor further, characterizing people as actors and referring to exits, entrances, and the many parts played in a lifetime. In the original passage, Jaques went on to describe the “seven ages” of man, but he could have pursued the metaphor in many other ways. He might have talked about people being well suited—or miscast—for their roles. He might have contrasted lead actors with those in supporting roles. He might have compared award-winning performances with forgettable ones. Once world is metaphorically transformed into stage, then all of the attributes of the target domain (stage) can be applied back to the original source domain (world).

ERROR ALERT: All over the internet, this observation is mistakenly presented as “a canvas to our imaginations.”

QUOTE NOTE: The first portion was one of Walpole’s favorite sayings, and he sometimes expressed it with a slightly different wording. For example, in an Aug. 16, 1776 letter to the Countess of Ossory, he wrote: “This world is a comedy to those that think, a tragedy to those that feel.”

QUOTATION CAUTION: The quotation has not been found in any of Whistler’s works. It’s possible that, in an impromptu interview moment, Behan was simply citing another well-known person as the author of one of his own observations. After citing the quotation, Behan quickly added: “I’m a nurse.”

The narrator of the tale, playing off the famous line from Shakespeare’s As You Like It (see above), introduced the thought by writing: “Actors are so fortunate. They can choose whether they will appear in tragedy or in comedy, whether they will suffer or make merry, laugh or shed tears. But in real life it is different. Most men and women are forced to perform parts for which they have no qualifications.”

WORLD WIDE WEB

(see INTERNET & WORLD WIDE WEB)

WORRY

(see also ANTICIPATION and ANQUISH and ANXIETY and CARES & CONCERNS and DIFFICULTIES and DREAD and FEAR and NERVES & NERVOUSNESS and SORROW and STRESS and TROUBLE)

Thomas added: “We worry away our lives, fearing the future, discontent with the present, unable to take in the idea of dying, unable to sit still.”

Russell continued: “A man who has learnt not to feel fear will find the fatigue of daily life enormously diminished.”

Ten Boom offered a number of memorable thoughts on the subject. In her 1978 book Don’t Wrestle, Just Nestle, she returned to the theme by writing: “Worry is like racing the engine of an automobile without letting in the clutch.” In Clippings From My Notebook (1982), she wrote: “Worry doesn’t empty tomorrow of its sorrows, it empties today of its strength.” And in Jesus is Victor (1985, she wrote: “Worry is a cycle of inefficient thoughts whirling around a center of fear.”

WORSHIP

(see also ADMIRATION and ADORATION and DIVINITY and GOD and IDOLS & IDOLATRY and IRREVERENCE and RELIGION and REVERENCE and [Hero] WORSHIP)

WORTH & WORTHINESS

(see also EXCELLENCE and IMPORTANCE and MERIT and QUALITY and SIGNIFICANCE and STATURE and VALUE)

Merton continued: “That is not our business and, in fact, it is nobody’s business. What we are asked to do is to love, and this love itself will render both ourselves and our neighbors worthy if anything can.”

WOUNDS

(see also FAMILY DYSFUNCTION and INJURIES and POST-TRAMATIC STRESS DISORDER [PTSD] and TRAUMA and SCARS and TROUBLES)

ERROR ALERT: Many internet sites mistakenly present the quotation in the following way (mistaken portion in italics): “A wound in a young heart is like a wound in a young tree. It does not grow out. It grows in.”

[Self-Inflicted] WOUNDS

(see also FAMILY DYSFUNCTION and INJURIES and POST-TRAMATIC STRESS DISORDER [PTSD] and TRAUMA and SCARS and TROUBLES)

QUOTE NOTE: The first portion of this observation is also commonly translated: “Every man is his own greatest enemy.”

Clinton continued: “And you get a lot of breaks you don’t deserve—both ways. So it’s important not to get too upset when you're having a bad day.”

Harris continued: “And nowhere do our injuries seem more casually self-inflicted, or the suffering we create more disproportionate to the needs of the moment, than in the lies we tell to other human beings. Lying is the royal road to chaos.”

WRESTLING

(see also ATHLETES & ATHLETICISM and BASEBALL and BASKETBALL and BOXING and FISHING and FOOTBALL and GOLF and HOCKEY and MOUNTAINEERING & ROCK-CLIMBING and POOL & BILLIARDS and RUNNING & JOGGING and SAILING & YACHTING and SOCCER and SPORT and SPORTS—MISC. TYPES and SWIMMING & DIVING and TENNIS and TRACK & FIELD and WALKING)

Barthes added: “And it is no more ignoble to attend a wrestled performance of Suffering than a performance of the sorrows of Arnolphe or Andromaque.”

QUOTE NOTE: In discussing his preparation for the role of Randy “The Ram” Robinson in the film The Wrestler (2008) Rourke said: “I knew 10 days into making this movie that this would be the best movie I ever made, and I knew after three days that it would be the hardest movie I ever made.” He went on to explain about wrestlers: “These guys get really hurt. You’ve got guys who are 265 [pounds] throwing you across the ring. They take several years to learn how to land. I landed like a lump of shit. Every bone in my body vibrated.” For the entire interview, go to: Rourke MTV News Interview.

WRINKLES

(see also AGE & AGING and [Old] AGE

Haddock preceded the thought by writing: “I suspect that in old age we naturally turn to the issues left unfinished in youth and to old grooves of behavior we cut deep in those energetic years.”

Mary continued: “By the time she is thirty, a starlet has been carefully taught to smile like a dead halibut. The eyes widen, the mouth drops open, but the eye muscles are never involved.”

Ullman preceded the thought by writing: “Nobody grows old by merely living a number of years; people grow old by deserting their ideals.”

ERROR ALERT: On his 75th birthday in 1955, Gen. Douglas MacArthur quoted, without attribution, this and other lines from Ullman’s poem. As a result, the saying is often mistakenly attributed to him.

Van Buren continued: “It’s true, some wine improves with age. But only if the grapes were good in the first place.”

WRITERS

(see also AUTOBIOGRAPHY and AUTHORS and BOOKS and EDITING & EDITORS and ESSAYS & ESSAYISTS and FICTION and LITERATURE and NOVELS & NOVELISTS and PUBLISHING & PUBLISHERS and REVISION & REWRITING and WRITERS—ADVICE ON WRITING and WRITERS—ON THEMSELVES & THEIR WORK and WRITERS—DESCRIBED BY OTHERS and WRITING and WRITING & WRITERS—N.E.C.)

Allende described writing is “an act of hope, a sort of communion with our fellow men.” And about the illuminating lamp, she added: “Only that, nothing more—a tiny beam of light to show some hidden aspect of reality, to help decipher and understand it and thus to initiate, if possible, a change in the conscience of some readers.”

Bagnold added: “It’s the streaming reason for living. To note, to pin down, to build up, to create, to be astonished at nothing, to cherish the oddities, to let nothing go down the drain, to make something, to make a great flower out of life, even if it’s a cactus.”

QUOTE NOTE: Dr. Bergler, a noted 20th-century psychoanalyst, coined the term “writer’s block.” This is how his quotation is commonly presented, but we may never know for certain how he originally phrased it. The observation was first referenced in Malcolm Cowley’s 1954 book The Literary Situation this way: “Elsewhere Dr. Bergler, speaking less politely, accuses every writer without exception of being a masochist, a sadist, a peeping Tom, an exhibitionist, a narcissist, an ‘injustice collector,’ and ‘a depressed person…constantly haunted by fears of unproductivity.’” See also the Leo Rosten entry below.

QUOTE NOTE: It’s possible that Gore Vidal was inspired by Brooks’s metaphor when, three years later, he was quoted in Time magazine (April 17, 1978) as saying: “Each writer is born with a repertory company in his head. Shakespeare had perhaps 20 players, and Tennessee Williams has about five and Samuel Beckett one—and perhaps a clone of that one. I have ten or so, and that’s a lot. As you get older, you become more skillful at casting them.”

ERROR ALERT: Many anthologies and web sites mistakenly present the quotation this way: “Writers are the main landmarks of the past.”

QUOTE NOTE: This in the opening paragraph of Epstein’s review of neurologist Alice W. Flaherty’s The Midnight Disease, a book about writing from the perspective of neuroscience. Epstein was not impressed with the book or the writer (he dismissed the book as “an assemblage of profoundly muddled notions” and put her into “the category of the cheerful amateur”). And about the author’s writing skills, Epstein wrote: “As a writer, not only does Dr. Flaherty use language in a loose and often dopey way, not only does she split infinitives with the easy exuberance of young Abe Lincoln splitting logs, but she provides no striking phrases or arresting metaphors, she over-dramatizes her own experience, lapses into cuteness and unconscious self-gratulation, and everywhere betrays many other marks of the amateur scribbler.”

Faulkner preceded the observation by saying: “An artist is a creature driven by demons. He doesn’t know why they chose him and he’s usually too busy to wonder why. He is completely amoral in that he will rob, borrow, beg, or steal from anybody and everybody to get the work done.” For a strikingly similar thought, see Emerson's “Art is a jealous mistress” observation in ART.

Forsyth continued: “People come into being, work, love, fight, die, and are replaced. Plots are devised, developed, amended, and come to fruition or are frustrated. It is a completely different world from the one outside the window. In children, daydreaming is rebuked; in a writer, it is indispensable.”

Galbraith added: “I have experienced these moments myself. Their lesson is simple: It’s a total illusion. And the danger in the illusion is that you will wait for those moments.”

Giovanni preceded the thought by saying: “Writers don’t write from experience, though many are hesitant to admit that they don't. I want to be clear about this. If you wrote from experience, you'd get maybe one book, maybe three poems.”

Hecht added: “Nobody but a writer can write. People who hang around writers for years–-as producers did-–who are much smarter and have much better taste, never learn to write.”

ERROR ALERT: Erroneous phrasings of this observation—some slight, some major—appear on almost all internet sites.

QUOTE NOTE: Speaking to his companion, Gwen Novak, Richard preceded the aforementioned observation by saying: “Writing is antisocial. It’s as solitary as masturbation. Disturb a writer when he is in the throes of creation and he is likely to turn and bit right to the bone…and not even know that he’s doing it. As writers’ wives and husbands often learn to their horror.”

QUOTE NOTE: Holmes was describing something many writers have dreamed about: the perfect reader for his material (he used the phrase “my One Reader”). He went on to add: “I have no doubt that we have each one of us, somewhere, our exact facsimile, so like us in all things except the accidents of condition, that we should love each other like a pair of twins, if our natures could once fairly meet.”

A little later, in a reference to the title of her book, Jong wrote: “The job of the writer is to seduce the demons of creativity and make up stories.”

QUOTE NOTE: After mentioning that his own family members were cautious about sharing details of their lives with him, Keillor went on to write: “People meet writers and are bowled over when the writer is friendly to them and invites them to his house for a glass of wine or to shoot up heroin or whatever they do, and they talk their heads off, and a year later it comes out in a book, and there follow years of bitter and fruitless litigation, and that is why you should always keep a writer at arm’s length.” At a 1998 Authors Guild symposium in Manhattan, Cynthia Ozick used a different metaphor to make a similar point: “We are cannibals. I think it’s a terrible thing to be a friend of, an acquaintance of, a relative of, a writer.”

Lamott preceded the thought by writing: “Seeing yourself in print is such an amazing concept: you can get so much attention without having to actually show up somewhere.”

Lederer created this analogy after struggling for years to answer the question, “Where do you get the ideas for your books?” Happy to have finally arrived at a satisfactory answer, he was eager to try it out. He got his chance a few days later while speaking to a sixth-grade class in Concord, New Hampshire. After a young lad asked the familiar question, Lederer simply posed a rhetorical question that he thought would make the point of his analogy: “Where does the spider get its web?” Of all the answers that might have come from the mind of a sixth-grade boy, Lederer could have never predicted the actual reply. He instantly shot back: “From its butt!”

QUOTE NOTE/ERROR ALERT: In offering this thought, Malamud was almost certainly inspired by a Dec. 10, 1957 remark made by Albert Camus in his speech accepting the Nobel Prize in Literature: “Each generation doubtless feels called upon to reform the world. Mine knows that it will not reform it, but its task is perhaps even greater. It consists in preventing the world from destroying itself.” Camus was talking about the responsibilities of an entire new generation, while Malamud restricted it to writers–and that is how the observation is remembered today. The Malamud version is frequently misattributed to Camus. Many thanks to Garson O’Toole, aka The Quote Investigator, for his research on this quotation.

ERROR ALERT: Almost all current books and anthologies omit the word underprivileged when featuring this observation. In Bird by Bird (1994), Anne Lamott picked up on the cow-milking metaphor when she was describing the experience of writers who know when they are writing really well: “It is as if the right words, the true words, are already inside them, and they just want to help them get out. Writing this way is a little like milking a cow: the milk is so rich and delicious, and the cow is so glad you did it.”

QUOTATION CAUTION: The observation, which may be seen at 15' 15'' into the documentary, came in a Q & A session after a 1991 address to members of the New Jersey Historical Society. So far, the observation has not been found in any of Milosz’s works.

QUOTE NOTE: This is the way the quotation typically appears, but the Times originally used the British spelling of yoghurt.

Oates added: “No matter what you are doing, driving a car or walking or doing housework…you can still be writing because you have that space.”

Peters added: “You didn’t get ideas. You smelled them out, tracked them down, wrestled them into submission; you pursued them with forks and hope, and if you were lucky enough to catch one you impaled it, with the forks, before the sneaky little devil could get away.”

In that same essay, Rosen wrote: “Anna Freud called play the work of children. And perhaps of writers, too.”

See also the related thought by Edmund Bergler above.

And then, about the third type of writer—the true giants of world literature—Schopenhauer wrote: “Fixed stars are the only ones that are constant; their position in the firmament is secure; they shine with a light of their own; their effect today is the same as it was yesterday, because . . . their appearance does not alter with a difference in our standpoint. They belong not to one system, one nation only, but to the universe. And just because they are so very far away, it is usually many years before their light is visible to the inhabitants of this earth.”

QUOTE NOTE: This has become one of Solzhenitsyn’s most famous quotations, a portion of it even showing up in the title of a June 23, 1972 Life magazine profile of the great Russian writer.

Sontag continued: “Literature is the house of nuance and contrariness against the voices of simplification. The job of the writer is to make it harder to believe the mental despoilers.”

Steinbeck continued: “We are lonesome animals. We spend all life [sic] trying to be less lonesome. One of our ancient methods is to tell a story begging the listener to say—and to feel—‘Yes, that’s the way it is, or at least that’s the way I feel it. You’re not as alone as you thought’.”

Thurber added:“But I don’t think he will get too badly burned. His faith in the good will, the soundness, and the sense of humor of his countrymen will always serve as his asbestos curtain.”

QUOTE NOTE: These are the opening words of the novel, from protagonist and narrator David Martin. He continues: “He will never forget the sweet poison of vanity in his blood and the belief that, if he succeeds in not letting anyone discover his lack of talent, the dream of literature will provide him with a roof over his head, a hot meal at the end of the day, and what he covets the most: his name printed on a miserable piece of paper that surely will outlive him. A writer is condemned to remember that moment, because from then on he is doomed and his soul has a price.”

WRITERS—ADVICE ON WRITING

(see also AUTHORS and BOOKS and EDITING & EDITORS and ESSAYS & ESSAYISTS and FICTION and LITERATURE and NOVELS & NOVELISTS and PUBLISHING & PUBLISHERS and REVISION & REWRITING and WRITERS and WRITERS—ON THEMSELVES AND THEIR WORK and WRITERS—DESCRIBED BY OTHERS and WRITING and WRITING & WRITERS—N.E.C.)

Bradbury added: “I have never had a dry spell in my life because I feed myself well, to the point of bursting. I wake early and hear my morning voices leaping around my head like jumping beans. I get out of bed to trap them before they escape.”

QUOTE NOTE: The poem continues with some of the best writing advice ever delivered in verse, ending this way: “when it is truly time,/and if you have been chosen,/it will do it by/itself and it will keep on doing it/until you die or it dies in you./there is no other way./and there never was.” To see the full poem, go to so you want to be a writer?. And if you really want to treat yourself, listen to the masterful Tom O’Bedlam read the entire poem on YouTube.

QUOTE NOTE: The notion here is to assist people in absorbing or incorporating the truth by expressing it to them indirectly, circuitously, or even allegorically. The eight-line poem ends with the couplet: “The Truth must dazzle gradually/Or every man be blind.” In The Life of Emily Dickinson (1994), biographer Richard B. Sewall wrote that the poem is a key to understanding Dickinson's life and work. “It is as if she lived out the advice she gave in her famous lines.” He added: “She avoided specifics, dodged direct confrontations, reserved commitments. She told the truth, or an approximation of it, so metaphorically that nearly a hundred years after her death and after much painstaking research, scholars still grope for certainties.”

Dillard added: “Do not hoard what seems good for a later place in the book, or for another book; give it, give it all, give it now…. Anything you do not give freely and abundantly becomes lost to you. You open your safe and find ashes.”

Hemingway continued: “But when you get the damned hurt use it—don’t cheat with it. Be as faithful to it as a scientist—but don’t think anything is of any importance because it happens to you or anyone belonging to you.”

QUOTE NOTE: Even though Johnson clearly indicated that he was passing along advice from an unnamed educator in his past, this observation is often mistakenly attributed directly to him. See the Quiller-Couch entry below for an observation that was almost certainly inspired by this 1773 remark.

Keillor continued: “A young writer is easily tempted by the allusive and ethereal and ironic and reflective, but the declarative is at the bottom of most good writing.”

Lamott continued: “Don’t worry about appearing sentimental. Worry about being unavailable; worry about being absent or fraduluent. Risk being unliked. Tell the truth as you understand it. If you’re a writer, you have a moral obligation to do this. And it is a revolutionary act—truth is always subversive.”

Lamott added: “Most human beings are dedicated to keeping that one door shut. But the writer’s job is to see what’s behind it, to see the bleak unspeakable stuff, and to turn the unspeakable into words—not just into any words but if we can, into rhythm and blues.”

McCourt added: “If you won the Irish Sweepstakes and bought a house that needed furniture would you fill it with bits and pieces of rubbish? Your mind is your house and if you fill it with rubbish from the cinemas, it will rot in your head. You might be poor, your shoes might be broken, but your mind is a palace.”

QUOTE NOTE: See the Samuel Johnson entry above for a 1773 remark that likely inspired this observation.

Safire added: “The secret way to do this is to write it down, and then cut out out the confusing parts.”

Shames added: “Also, unless you’re a flat-out genius, you’re going to do a fair amount of sloppy, self-indulgent crap before you get down to anything good. Write that garbage out of your system. Then get over yourself, stop showing off your vocabulary, and think about the reader for a change. Give the reader someone to root for and a reason to turn the page. Don’t ask the reader to do the work you should have done yourself.”

QUOTATION CAUTION: So far, this is the earliest appearance I’ve been able to find of this popular observation on the importance of brevity in writing and speaking. Despite years of sleuthing by quotation researchers, the passage has not been found in Southey’s works (I've also recently searched all four volumes of Southey’s Common-Place books without success). The quotation has also been occasionally attributed to John Dryden, but never with any supporting evidence.

Stein’s seventh commandment was also expressed metaphorically: “Thy language shall be precise, clear and bear the wings of angels, for anything less is the province of businessmen and academics and not of writers.”

Strunk added: “This requires not that the writer make all his sentences short, or that he avoid all detail and treat his subjects only in outline, but that every word tell.”

QUOTE NOTE: A moment earlier, Ueland introduced the thought by writing: “It helps often to have an imaginary listener when you are writing, telling a story, so that you will be interesting and convincing throughout.”

Walker, the city editor at the New York Herald Tribune, was one of the best known “newspaper men” of his time. He continued: “Because one adjective is as revealing as a lightning flash, don’t think that ten will make the story ten times as good. There is a law of diminishing returns.”

QUOTE NOTE: In Sitwell’s book, his autobiography, he said that Wells made the remark directly to him. In 1950, the popular advertising trade publication Printer’s Ink reprinted the quotation, saying about it: “To a writer friend H. G. Wells once gave this bit of sage advice.” The magazine piece added: “Goes great for advertising copy, too.”

Wiesel’s metaphor about having a burning desire to write was offered to writers and teachers attending the 1988 National Writers’ Workshop in Hartford, Connecticut. Wiesel, who suggested that writers have a “moral obligation” to chronicle war crimes and other horrors so that they will not be forgotten by future generations, introduced the thought by saying: “Whatever happens to one community affects us all. When one person is humiliated, humanity is guilty of shame. The valuable lesson is to inspire with your words.”

QUOTE NOTE: Wodehouse continued: “I think the success of every novel—if it’s a novel of action—depends on the high spots. The thing to do is to say to yourself, ‘Which are my big scenes? and then get every drop of juice out of them.”

QUOTE NOTE: This is commonly presented as a piece of writing advice, but that was not Wordsworth’s intention. He simply used the phrase in the closing words of his letter. Here’s the full passage: “Write to me frequently & the longest letters possible; never mind whether you have facts or no to communicate; fill your paper with the breathings of your heart.”

Zinsser added: “Short paragraphs put air around what you write and make it look inviting, whereas a long chunk of type can discourage a reader from even starting to read.” He went on to caution: “But don’t go berserk. A succession of tiny paragraphs is as annoying as a paragraph that’s too long.”

Zinsser continued: “Good criticism needs a lean and vivid style to express what you observed and what you think. Florid adjectives smack of the panting prose with which Vogue likes to disclose its latest chichi discovery: ‘We’ve just heard about the most utterly enchanting little beach at Cozumel.’”

WRITERS—ON THEMSELVES AND THEIR WORK

(see also AUTHORS and BOOKS and EDITING & EDITORS and ESSAYS & ESSAYISTS and FICTION and LITERATURE and NOVELS & NOVELISTS and PUBLISHING & PUBLISHERS and REVISION & REWRITING and WRITERS and WRITERS—ADVICE ON WRITING and WRITERS—DESCRIBED BY OTHERS and WRITING and WRITING & WRITERS—N.E.C.)

Abbey continued, and ended the essay, with this: “I write to make a difference. ‘It is always a writer’s duty,’ said Samuel Johnson, ‘to make the world better.’ I write to give pleasure and promote aesthetic bliss. To honor life and to praise the divine beauty of the natural world. I write for the joy and exultation of writing itself. To tell my story.”

QUOTE NOTE: Achebe, often described as the father of modern African literature, was reflecting on his early school experiences in 1930s Nigeria. Reading history books that celebrated the exploits of European explorers of the African continent, he found himself naturally siding with the heroic white people. It was only when he realized the bitter truth contained in the proverbial saying about lions and hunters that he found his calling. He continued: “Once I realized that, I had to be a writer. I had to be that historian. It’s not one man’s job. It’s not one person’s job. But it is something we have to do, so that the story of the hunt will also reflect the agony, the travail—the bravery, even, of the lions. “

QUOTE NOTE: For other quotations on the theme of writing to find out what one thinks, see the entries in this section by Joan Didion, Stephen King, Flannery O’Connor, V. S. Pritchett, and James Reston.

Asimov continued: “But I don’t want to, thank you. I know all about my compulsion and I like it and intend to keep it. Someone else can have my ticket for sleeping in the sun and playing golf.”

QUOTE NOTE: This appeared in Asimov’s final article, written just before his death at age 72 on April 6, 1992. He preceded the thought by writing in his opening paragraph:

“I have written three hundred ninety-nine essays for Fantasy & Science Fiction. The essays were written with enormous pleasure, for I have always been allowed to say what I wanted to say. It was with horror that I discovered I could not manage a four hundredth essay.”

After writing more than 500 books and thousands of essays and articles, Asimov had no desire to ever retire—and there is no way he could have ever foreseen the circumstances surrounding his own death. While the official cause of death was listed as heart and kidney failure, it wasn't until a decade later that his widow and other family members revealed that his heart and liver problems were the result of an HIV infection contracted from a blood transfusion during a 1988 triple bypass surgery.

Atwood continued: “She is the tenth Muse, the one without whom none of the others can function. The gift she offers you is the freedom of the second chance. Or as many chances as you’ll take.”

QUOTE NOTE: Baker was five years old when his father died (of complications related to diabetes).

Bradbury began by saying: “Every so often, late at night, I come downstairs, open one of my books, read a paragraph and say, “My God.” I sit there and cry because I haven’t done any of this. It’s a God-given thing, and I’m so grateful, so, so grateful.”

Burroughs added: “I see no point in exploring areas that have already been thoroughly surveyed.”

QUOTE NOTE: Chekhov is best remembered as a writer, but he was also a practicing physician until his premature death at age forty-four (from complications related to tuberculosis). He began writing in his spare time while in medical school, and he juggled both careers until his premature death. Chekhov returned to the wife-mistress metaphor the following year in a letter to A. N. Pleshcheev (Jan. 15, 1889), but this time in a slightly different context: “Narrative prose is a legal wife, while drama is a posturing, boisterous, cheeky and wearisome mistress.”

In that same letter, Colette wrote: “The only virtue on which I pride myself is my self-doubt. If every day I find myself more circumspect toward my work, and more uncertain as to whether I should continue, my only self-assurance comes from my fear itself. For when a writer loses his self-doubt, the time has come to lay aside his pen.”

Conroy continued: “The library staff knew me on a first-name basis; I felt as comfortable entering the Citadel library as a shell entering its shell.”

The words come from the narrator, but they capture the beliefs of the author. The line comes from the story’s opening paragraph, which begins with the narrator saying that, rain or shine, he takes a walk around the Palais-Royal every day at five o’clock. He continues:

“I discuss with myself questions of politics, love, taste, or philosophy. I let my mind rove wantonly, give it free rein to follow any idea, wise or mad, that may come uppermost; I chase it as do our young libertines along Foy’s Walk, when they are on the track of a courtesan whose mien is giddy and face smiling, whose nose turns up. The youth drops one and picks up another, pursuing all and clinging to none: my ideas are my trollops.” [Jacques Barzun’s 1956 translation]. Some earlier translations rendered the final line as My ideas are my harlots.

QUOTE NOTE: Didion may have been influenced by a similar observation from Mark Twain’s Autobiography: “I know grammar by ear only, not by note, not by the rules.” See the complete Twain passage in the GRAMMAR section.

QUOTE NOTE: For other quotations on the theme of writing to find out what one thinks, see the entries in this section by Edward Albee, Stephen King, Flannery O’Connor, V. S. Pritchett, and James Reston.

Dillard continued: “Your work is to keep cranking the flywheel that turns the gears that spin the belt in the engine of belief that keeps you and your desk in midair.”

Later in the book, Dillard returned to the taming-the-wild-beast metaphor: “This is your life. You are a Seminole alligator wrestler. Half naked, with your two bare hands, you hold and fight a sentence’s head while its tail tries to knock you over.”

Ellison continued: “It often looks like egomania. I assure you it’s the bold coverup of the absolutely terrified.”

QUOTE NOTE: As much as any other writer, Ellison has written about the “mortal dread” he has experienced when sitting down at his writing desk and attempting to bring words to a blank page. In the case of “Django,” those fears were heightened because he wrote the entire story while sitting in the front window of a bookstore in Boston. It was all part of a publicity stunt dreamed up by the owners of the Avenue Victor Hugo Bookshop, who were trying to draw more foot traffic into the store. Ellison found the whole experience “unnerving,” and it even left him with serious doubts about the quality of the story he was writing, Those doubts ultimately vanished, however, when it was selected as Galileo magazine's Best Short Story of the Year.

Joseph Epstein, “Writing on the Brain,” in Commentary magazine (April, 2004)

This was Faulkner’s famous answer to the question: “You mentioned experience, observation, and imagination as being important for a writer. Would you include inspiration?”

QUOTATION CAUTION: This quotation is commonly misinterpreted to mean that Faulkner abstained from drinking while in the middle of a writing groove (an interpretation fostered by George Plimpton, when he included the quote in the “On Performance” section of his 1989 Writer’s Chapbook). The truth, though, is that the observation reflects a problem Faulkner had in giving compliments and praise to people (in this case Albert Erskine, his longstanding Random House editor). The full passage from Morgan’s book makes it clear: “Once he said he liked his editor, Albert Erskine, but he wouldn't tell him. He said, ‘When my horse is running, I don’t stop to give him sugar.’”

Ferber added: “Dislike, displeasure, resentment, fault-finding, indignation, passionate remonstrance, a sense of injustice, are perhaps corrosive to the container, but they make fine fuel.”

Fisher continued: “I’m a conversationalist more than a writer. I take dictation from myself. I talk about myself behind my back.”

This was how Flanner described her approach to writing her “Letter from Paris” feature, which first appeared in The New Yorker in September, 1925 and continued on a bi-weekly basis until her retirement fifty years later. The feature was written under the pen name “Genêt,” a name given her by editor Harold Ross (according to New Yorker legend, Ross believed it was the French name for “Janet”).

Flaubert often described writing as a grueling, even painful process. In an 1852 letter to Colet, his mistress for many years, he provided this additional glimpse into his feelings about his career as a writer: “I love my work with a frenetic and perverse love, as an ascetic loves the hair shirt which scratches his belly.”

QUOTE NOTE: Flaubert struggled for years with Madame Bovary, which ultimately became his most celebrated work. In a letter to Colet five years earlier (Oct. 23, 1851), he wrote: “I am finding it very hard to get my novel started. I suffer from stylistic abscesses; and sentences keep itching without coming to a head.”

This comes from the very first essay in the compilation, which may be read in full here. The essay also contains these additional reflections:

“A day when I write nothing is a desert.“

“Writing has always been with me a semireligious occupation, by which I certainly don't mean that I regard it with pious awe, but rather that I can't regard it simply as a craft, a job.”

To see the full article, in which writer D. Keith Mano described writing as “an emotional laxative” for Fussell, go to People magazine.

QUOTE NOTE: The 82-year-old Gilbert offered this thought just after winning the poetry award at the Los Angeles Times Festival of Books in 2006. It was the first major prize he had been awarded since receiving the Yale [University] Younger Poets Prize in 1962.

Godwin added: “And even with the ones I do finish, I think of all the ways they might have been better.”

Greeley preceded the observation by writing: “Fantasy is not merely a distinct genre. All fiction is fantasy, a narrative of a world and people created by the storyteller’s imagination.”

Heller continued: “The ideas come to me; I don’t produce them at will. They come to me in the course of a sort of controlled daydream, a directed reverie.”

QUOTE NOTE: Hemingway, who was almost affectedly fond of using boxing metaphors, concluded: “But nobody’s going to get me in any ring with Mr. Tolstoy unless I’m crazy or I keep getting better.

This is a well-known example of what has become known as Hemingway’s Iceberg Theory of Writing. He first introduced the metaphor in Death in the Afternoon (1932), where he wrote: “If a writer of prose knows enough about what he is writing about he may omit things that he knows and the reader, if the writer is writing truly enough, will have a feeling of those things as strongly as though the writer had stated them. The dignity of movement of an iceberg is due to only one-eighth of it being above water.”

QUOTE NOTE: The Four Million was a collection of short stories that reflected O. Henry’s commitment to writing for a broad and diverse readership, and not just for the social or economic elite. During America's “Gilded Age,” the phrase “The 400” became associated with Caroline Schermerhorn Astor, commonly known as Mrs. Astor. The doyenne of New York City’s high society, her annual ball was a prestigious social event, and it was said that her ballroom could accommodate a maximum of 400 guests.

QUOTE NOTE: Two metaphors in this well known self-description have become so intimately associated with Hurston that they’ve been used to title biographies about her: Sorrow’s Kitchen: The Life and Folklore of Zora Neale Hurston (1993) and Wrapped in Rainbows: The Life of Zora Neale Hurston (2003) by Valerie Boyd.

Iyer continued: “Every day so many experiences, feelings, incidents, encounters crash in on us, and every morning I retire to my desk to make a kind of sense of them, to put them into a larger frame, to find out what my priorities should be. It’s like sifting through the shells you’ve collected after a walk along the beach, and it makes for a stillness that lends peace and direction to the day that follows.”

Irving added: “I think of writing fiction as doing justice to the people in the story, and doing justice to their story—it’s not my story. It’s entirely ghostly work; I’m just the medium. As a writer, I do more listening than talking.”

In that interview, Irving also wrote: “I am compulsive about writing, I need to do it the way I need sleep and exercise and food and sex; I can go without it for a while, but then I need it.”

QUOTE NOTE: The words, which appear on the first page of the book, come from the narrator, but they are believed to reflect the real-world views of the author as well. Goodbye to Berlin was a semi-autobiographical portrayal of Isherwood’s time in Berlin in the early 1930s. When the book was adapted by John Van Druten into a Broadway play in 1951, the title was changed to I Am a Camera. While the play earned Julie Harris a Tony Award, it was famously panned by Walter Kerr with the words: “Me no Leica.” Fifteen years later, I Am a Camera was further adapted for Broadway, this time into the hit musical Cabaret (1966).

Kazin preceded the thought by writing: “All this lifetime feeling, all this long passion of the heart, all this longing—all this anger—all this bitterness, all this love, all this seeking.”

QUOTE NOTE: In his Spring, 1991 Paris Review interview, Tom Wolfe recalled this Kesey observation and applied it to his own life: “I can sympathize with Ken Kesey who once said that he stopped writing because he was tired of being a seismograph—an instrument that measures rumblings from a great distance. He said he wanted to be a lightning rod—where it all happens at once, quick, and decisive. Perhaps this applies to painters, though I don’t know.”

QUOTE NOTE: In his 1956 Paris Review interview, William Faulkner made a similar observation about artists when he cleverly suggested that the creation of a work of art was like scribbling “Kilroy was here” on a wall. For the full quotation, see the Faulkner entry in ARTISTS.

QUOTE NOTE: For other quotations on the theme of writing to find out what one thinks, see the entries in this section by Edward Albee, Joan Didion, Flannery O’Connor, V. S. Pritchett, and James Reston.

Lamott continued: “While others who have something to say or who want to be effectual, like musicians or baseball players or politicians, have to get out there in front of people, writers, who tend to be shy, get to stay home and still be public. There are many obvious advantages to this. You don’t have to dress up, for instance, and you can’t hear them boo you right away.”

Lebowitz continued: “I never wanted to be anything else. Well, if there had been a job of being a reader, I would have taken that, because I love to read and I don’t love to write. That would be blissful.”

Lebowitz continued: “I read two to four mysteries a week. I don’t care who did it. I read them for the soothing prose.”

Lederer introduced the thought by writing: “Carnivores eat flesh and meat; piscivores eat fish; herbivores consume plants and vegetables; verbivores devour words. I am such a creature.”

L’Engle preceded the thought by writing: “A life lived in chaos is an impossibility for the artist. No matter how unstructured may seem the painter’s garret in Paris or the poet’s pad in Greenwich Village, the artist must have some kind of order or he will produce a very small body of work.”

QUOTE NOTE: This was Riazi’s reply when interviewer Erin F. Wasinger asked, “Do you have a Madeleine story/quote/moment that has inspired you?” Riazi went on to say about the observation: “This quote has carried me through a lot of moments in which my love of writing for children has been demeaned, dismissed, or otherwise brushed aside as ‘not serious craft.’” Riazi, a L’Engle fan since she read A Wrinkle in Time at age eight, is the author of The Gauntlet (2017) and other books.

I have been unable to find the foregoing quotation in any of L’Engle’s works, and now believe she was paraphrasing rather than directly quoting popular observation from A Circle of Quiet (1972): “If I have something I want to say that is too difficult for adults to swallow, then I will write it in a book for children.”

QUOTE NOTE: The line first appeared in the 1951 film An American In Paris, and was officially credited to screenwriter Alan Jay Lerner. However, Levant apparently suggested the line to Lerner, so deserves credit as the author. In a 1960s appearance on The Tonight Show, Levant reprised the sentiment by saying to Jack Paar: “Underneath this flabby exterior is an enormous lack of character.”

Lewis preceded the thought by writing: “When I was ten, I read fairy tales in secret and would have been ashamed if I had been found doing so. Now that I am fifty I read them openly.”

QUOTE NOTE: The quotation now appears on the homepage of McMillan’s website: www.terrymcmillan.com

QUOTE NOTE: In the early 70s, following the success of Horseman, Pass By (made into the 1962 film Hud) and The Last Picture Show, McMurtry and two partners opened up an antiquarian bookstore near Georgetown University in Washington, D.C. Named Booked Up, the entire operation was moved in 1988 to McMurtry’s home town of Archer City, Texas (population under 2,000). It ultimately became the country’s largest antiquarian bookstore, with nearly a half-million titles. The rise of internet bookselling ultimately took its toll, however, and in 2012 the enterprise was drastically downsized in an epic auction called “The Last Book Sale” (playing off the title The Last Picture Show). It continues to exist on a more limited scale (www.bookedupac.com).

QUOTE NOTE: Michener expressed this thought in different ways on different occasions. Here are two other common versions:

“I am not a good writer. But I am one hell of a rewriter.”

“I am not a good writer, but I am an excellent rewriter.”

QUOTE NOTE: Millay’s letter came after seven years of steady pressure from her publisher, Harper & Brothers, to come out with a new book. She was America’s favorite female poet at the time, and her publisher had been advancing her $250 a month in anticipation of a forthcoming work. With no new work on the horizon, the publisher hoped to capitalize on Millay’s fame by publishing an anthology of her previous verse. Millay had rejected a number of these proposals over the years and, just prior to this 1948 letter, she received yet another proposal (for a project called The Love Poems of Edna St. Vincent Millay). In a letter to Cass Canfield, her editor at Harper & Brothers, she also rejected this latest proposal, and she expressed herself in a most memorable way.

Nin was quoting from a letter she'd written to a writer who had asked, “Why does one write?” She went on to add: “We also write…to lure and enchant and console others, we write to serenade our lovers. We write to taste life twice, in the moment, and in retrospection.”

Oates added: “It’s not the best way to build a ladder, but I don’t know any other way.” To listen to the entire interview, go to: Oates “Wired for Books”.

O’Connor continued: “You may write for the joy of it, but the act of writing is not complete in itself. It has its end in its audience.”

QUOTE NOTE: For other quotations on the theme of writing to find out what one thinks, see the entries in this section by Edward Albee, Joan Didion, Stephen King, V. S. Pritchett, and James Reston.

QUOTE NOTE: Ozick was reflecting on the many years she spent writing before her first book was published at age 37 (Trust, in 1966)

Perelman added: “It’s a strange way for an adult to make a living, isn’t it?”

QUOTE NOTE: This is how the quotation is typically presented, but there’s an interesting story behind it. Perelman had been thinking about moving from America to England for several years, once saying that he might enjoy living in a nation that had a “taste for eccentricity.” MacPherson interviewed him just prior to his departure in the fall of 1970.

In the interview, Perelman said he had received many letters that all pretty much said the same thing: “I wish I had the guts to do what you’re doing.” About these letters, he commented, “It doesn’t take guts. The dubious privilege of a freelance writer is he’s given the freedom to starve anywhere.” Perelman stay in England was short-lived. As he was returning to America in 1972, he offered one of his most famous observations about the English people (see the Perelman entry in UNCOUTH).

Peters added: “You didn’t get ideas. You smelled them out, tracked them down, wrestled them into submission; you pursued them with forks and hope, and if you were lucky enough to catch one you impaled it, with the forks, before the sneaky little devil could get away.”

QUOTE NOTE: For other quotations on the theme of writing to find out what one thinks, see the entries in this section by Edward Albee, Joan Didion, Stephen King, Flannery O’Connor, and James Reston.

QUOTE NOTE: This passage has also been translated as follows: “In reality every reader is, while he is reading, the reader of his own self. The writer’s work is merely a kind of optical instrument which he offers to the reader to enable him to discern what, without this book, he would perhaps never have perceived in himself.”

QUOTE NOTE: The author here is not the famous 17th century British statesman and explorer, but a similarly-named Professor of English Literature at Oxford University (he was born in 1879 and died in 1922). After publishing a book about Shakespeare in 1907, this Sir Walter wrote more fully: “Everyone says it was a horribly difficult thing to write on Shakespeare. So it was and is, I suppose, but I didn’t think of it that way, or I couldn’t have written. I can’t write a book commensurate with Shakespeare, but I can write a book by me, which is all that any one can do. I feel as free to think about Shakespeare as to think about the moon, without putting myself into competition. So I was not conscious of impudence, or even of ambition.”

My heartfelt thanks to Garson O'Toole, aka The Quote Investigator, for his typically rigorous research on this quotation. See his post here

ERROR ALERT: This observation from Reston is often mistakenly phrased as “what I (italics mine) think when I can’t read what I write,” and offered as a memorable bon mot on the craft of writing. The truth is that it was originally offered during a 1966 New York City newspaper strike that lasted for 114 days. Reston’s full thought was: “I've been fielding the Times on the first bounce on my front stoop every morning now for 25 years, and it's cold and lonely out there now. Besides, how do I know what to think when I can’t read what I write.” It’s possible that Reston was influenced by a remark from an unnamed elderly woman that E. M. Forster passed along in his 1927 book Aspects of the Novel: “How can I tell what I think till I see what I say?”

QUOTE NOTE: For other quotations on the theme of writing to find out what one thinks, see the entries in this section by Edward Albee, Joan Didion, Stephen King, and Flannery O’Connor, and V. S. Pritchett.

QUOTE NOTE: This was the first time Roth gave his own first name to a character in one of his fictional works; it seems safe to conclude that the character was reflecting the views of the author.

QUOTE NOTE: Rundell’s observation came as she was speaking to Charles about her new children’s novel Impossible Creatures.

QUOTE NOTE: This was a key portion of Sagan’s reply when, during a 1956 visit to the United States, she was asked if she would consider writing a short piece for The New York Times. Sagan was an international celebrity at the time (her 1954 novel Bonjour Tristesse had appeared in an English translation a year earlier and a film adaptation was in the works). Hoping to entice her, the newspaper told Sagan that they were willing to accept an article on just about any topic: Paris, her youth, her current life, some aspect of her writing, whatever. In his piece, Breit attempted a phonetically accurate version of Sagan’s heavily-accented reply:

“What could I say about Parees that as not been said before? And youth? I feel forty years removed from youth. About myself? I can tell in one sentence: I shall live bad if I do not write and I shall write bad if I do not live.”

ERROR ALERT: Almost all internet sites and published quotation anthologies present a grammatically correct version of Sagan’s original words (“I shall live badly if I do not write and I shall write badly if I do not live”). Her original words and the “corrected” version, of course, are examples of the literary device known as chiasmus. Many thanks to Garson O’Toole, the Quote Investigator, for his invaluable help in sourcing this quotation.

Sanders continued: “Somehow the story and the language have to be a little messy or low. I love the idea of pushing an idea through a too-small linguistic opening—that feeling of overflow. I love the idea that the passion contained in a story is so great that it fucks up the form and makes it unseemly and impolite.”

QUOTE NOTE: This was Sontag’s reply to the question, “Do you think much about the audience for your books?”

Sontag went on to add: “[I started reading] When I was three, I’m told. Anyway, I remember reading real books—biographies, travel books—when I was about six. And then free fall into Poe and Shakespeare and Dickens and the Brontës and Victor Hugo and Schopenhauer and Pater, and so on. I got through my childhood in a delirium of literary exaltations.”

Sontag continued: “Needless to say, no sooner had these perky phrases fallen out of my mouth than I thought of some more recipes for writer’s virtue. For instance: ‘Be serious.’ By which I meant: Never be cynical. And which doesn’t preclude being funny. And…if you’ll allow me one more: ‘Take care to be born at a time when it was likely that you would be definitively exalted and influenced by Dostoevsky, and Tolstoy, and Turgenev, and Chekhov.’” [ellipsis in original]

Writing is hell has become one of Styron’s most frequently quoted lines. Only twenty-eight and the author of only one novel (Lie Down in Darkness) at the time, he was asked, “Do you enjoy writing?” After immediately replying, “I certainly don’t,” he continued as above. Later in the interview, he admitted he was happiest when writing: “When I’m writing I find it’s the only time that I feel completely self-possessed, even when the writing itself is not going too well. It’s fine therapy for people who are perpetually scared of nameless threats as I am most of the time—for jittery people. Besides, I’ve discovered that when I’m not writing I’m prone to developing certain nervous tics, and hypochondria. Writing alleviates those quite a bit.” See the full interview at Paris Review

Theroux was a twenty-five-year-old teacher in Uganda when he was urged to persevere by Naipul, then in his mid-thirties and already the author of five novels, including A House for Mr. Biswas. About Naipul's approval/encouragement, he wrote: “He gave me that, and it meant everything.”

QUOTE NOTE: Thomas originally wrote the Manifesto in 1951, in response to five questions submitted by a student who was writing a thesis on him. For one other fascinating thing Thomas attempted to do with words, see his WORDS entry.

Tyler added: “It’s lucky I do it on paper. Probably I would be schizophrenic—and six times divorced—if I weren’t writing. I would decide that I want to run off and join the circus and I would go.”

From an early age, Updike showed talent at both writing and drawing, and for a time he even dreamed of a career as a cartoonist. After graduating with a degree in English from Harvard in 1954, he spent a year at Oxford University’s Ruskin School of Drawing and Fine Arts. In the interview, he added: “Painting is great training for a writer. It makes you more visually alert and forces you to compose. A book has to have a shape.”

QUOTE NOTE: In the article, Updike was “interviewed” by his popular fictional character, Henry Bech, a Jewish writer who has long served as an alter-ego to Updike.

Waugh continued: “I have no technical psychological interest; it is drama, speech,and events that interest me.”

Wharton continued: “That new, that personal, vision is attained only by looking long enough at the object represented to make it the writer’s own; and the mind which would bring this secret gem to fruition must be able to nourish it with an accumulated wealth of knowledge and experience.”

White introduced the subject by writing: “I discovered a long time ago that writing of the small things of the day, the trivial matters of the heart, the inconsequential but near things of this living, was the only kind of creative work which I could accomplish with any sincerity or grace. As a reporter, I was a flop, because I always came back laden not with facts about the case, but with a mind full of the little difficulties and amusements I had encountered in my travels.”

White preceded the thought by writing: “Much writing today strikes me as deprecating, destructive, and angry. There are good reasons for anger, and I have nothing against anger. But I think some writers have lost their sense of proportion, their sense of humor, and their sense of appreciation.”

Whitman explained his writing process this way: “The secret of it all is to write in the gush, the throb, the flood, of the moment—to put things down without deliberation—without waiting for a fit time or place. I always worked that way. I took the first scrap of paper, the first doorstep, the first desk, and wrote, wrote, wrote.”

QUOTE NOTE: The words come from a fictional character—an aspiring poet—but I am certain they also express how Williams felt about his own work as a writer. The words are also an example of the literary device known as chiasmus.

QUOTE NOTE: In the article, published several days before A Streetcar Named Desire was about to open on Broadway, Williams wrote about how his life had changed in the three years since his earlier play The Glass Menagerie had opened to rave reviews in Chicago in 1944. “I was snatched out of virtual oblivion,” he wrote, “and thrust into sudden prominence.” In 1945, the play moved to Broadway, where it went on to commercial success and critical acclaim (including the winning of the New York Drama Critics Circle Award). Prior to the overnight success, Williams wrote that his was “a life clawing and scratching along a sheer surface and holding on tight with raw fingers to every inch of rock higher than the one caught hold of before, but it was a good life because it was the sort of life for which the human organism is created.” The full article, a metaphorical tour de force that should be required reading for anyone who’s ever been skyrocketed to success, may be seen at: ”The Catastrophe of Success”.

Williams introduced the thought by saying: “The heart of man, his body and his brain, are forged in a white-hot furnace for the purpose of conflict. That struggle for me is creation. I cannot live without it. Luxury is the wolf at the door and its fangs are the vanities and conceits germinated by success. When an artist learns this, he knows where the dangers lie.”

QUOTE NOTE: In an April, 1973 Playboy magazine interview, Williams essentially recycled this entire observation, thus accounting for the slightly differing versions you will find of the same sentiment.

QUOTE NOTE: These are the opening words of the novel (from protagonist and narrator David Martin), and they almost certainly express the views of the author. Martin continues: “He will never forget the sweet poison of vanity in his blood and the belief that, if he succeeds in not letting anyone discover his lack of talent, the dream of literature will provide him with a roof over his head, a hot meal at the end of the day, and what he covets the most: his name printed on a miserable piece of paper that surely will outlive him. A writer is condemned to remember that moment, because from then on he is doomed and his soul has a price.”

Zinsser preceded the thought by writing: “I always write to affirm. I choose to write about people whose values I respect; my pleasure is to bear witness to their lives.”

WRITERS—DESCRIBED BY OTHERS

(see also AUTHORS and BOOKS and EDITING & EDITORS and ESSAYS & ESSAYISTS and LITERATURE and NOVELS & NOVELISTS and PUBLISHING & PUBLISHERS and REVISION & REWRITING and WRITERS and WRITERS—ADVICE ON WRITING and WRITERS—ON THEMSELVES & THEIR WORK and WRITING and WRITING & WRITERS—N.E.C.)

AUTHOR NOTE: With The Time Machine (1895), The Invisible Man (1897), and The War of the Worlds (1898), Wells almost created a template used by later sci-fi writers (the same might also be said of Jules Verne). Wells’s fans included some of history’s greatest writers, including Henry James, who said, “Whatever Wells writes is not only alive, but kicking.” Not all writers admired him, though, especially in his later works. In a review of his 1912 novel Marriage, Rebecca West called him “The Old Maid among novelists.”

Adams preceded the observation by writing: “What Wodehouse writes is pure word music. It matters not one whit that he writes endless variations on a theme of pig kidnappings, lofty butlers, and ludicrous impostures.”

Banville preceded the thought by writing: “Hugh Trevor-Roper was one of the greatest prose stylists in the English language. He was also a man of prodigious learning, a classical scholar, and a remarkable historian. As a writer he took for models Francis Bacon, Donne, Hobbes, Sir Thomas Browne, Gibbon, and, perhaps surprisingly, Flaubert, and perhaps more surprisingly, George Moore. Stylistically, his nearest though laggardly competitor among his contemporaries would have been Evelyn Waugh, who loathed him personally—they both greatly admired Gibbon and sought to emulate his sonorous periods.”

Robertson added: “My scent has been even later in catching the breeze.”

QUOTE NOTE: Balzac, who often worked up to eighteen hours a day, drank forty to fifty cups of coffee a day. Over time, he gradually reduced the amount of water used in order to concentrate the caffeine dosage. Near the end of his life, he eliminated the water entirely, simply eating dry coffee grounds (many believe he ultimately died of caffeine poisoning). Balzac was the prototype of a person who carries things to excess. In The Literary Life and Other Curiosities (1981), Robert Hendrickson called him the world's greatest literary glutton, writing: “A typical meal for the French novelist consisted of a hundred oysters for starters; twelve lamb cutlets; a duckling with turnips; two roast partridges; sole a la Normandy; various fruits; and wines, coffee, and liqueurs to wash it all down.”

Gaiman continued: “Behind every Chesterton sentence there was someone painting with words, and it seemed to me that at the end of any particularly good sentence or any perfectly-put paradox, you could hear the author, somewhere behind the scenes, giggling with delight.“ Gaiman’s speech, a tribute to J. R. R. Tolkien, C. S. Lewis, and G. K. Chesterton, is available for viewing at: Gaiman on Chesterton.

For how the author himself described what came to be known as his “Iceberg Theory of Writing,” see the Hemingway entry in WRITERS—ON THEMSELVES.

AUTHOR NOTE: Levin authored many popular suspense novels later adapted into films (A Kiss Before Dying, Rosemary’s Baby, The Stepford Wives, The Boys From Brazil, and Deathtrap). A 1976 Newsweek article by Peter Prescott said of him: “A novel by Ira Levin is like a bag of popcorn: utterly without nutritive value and probably fattening, yet there’s no way to stop once you’ve started.”

QUOTE NOTE: While Lowell did admire Pope’s wit, he was no fan of the man or his creations. Regarding “The Dunciad,” one of Pope’s most famous pieces of verse, Lowell wrote that it was “even nastier than it was witty. It is filthy even in a filthy age.” He concluded about the piece: “One’s mind needs to be sprinkled with some disinfecting fluid after reading it.” By the way, it was in this essay that Lowell offered his popular tweaking of a familiar proverb: “A man’s mind is known by the company it keeps.”

Lucas continued: “Three surgical-steel rings hang from the cartilage of his left ear; on his left shoulder is a tattoo of a dragon entwined around a skull. Under a sizable paunch dangled a heavy key chain, which jingled as he shook my hand.”

Macaulay continued: “In wit, if by wit be meant the power of perceiving analogies between things which appear to have nothing in common, he never had an equal.”

QUOTE NOTE: Melville was not a fan of Emerson the writer (once calling his writing “oracular gibberish”), but he greatly admired Emerson the thinker. He referred to deep-thinking writers as a “whole corps of thought-divers, that have been diving and coming up again with bloodshot eyes since the world began.”

Neruda added: “I don't want those things to happen to me, and so I greedily devour all the fabrications, myths, contradictions, and mortal games of the great Julio Cortázar.”

QUOTE NOTE: This is one of Reed’s most frequently quoted descriptions. What is less well known is how he continued the description of Williams: “His tongue seems coated with rum and molasses as it darts in and out of his mouth, licking at his moustache like a pink lizard. His voice wavers unsteadily like old gray cigar smoke in a room with no ventilation, rising to a mad cackle like a wounded macaw, settling finally in a cross somewhere between Tallulah Bankhead and Everett Dirksen. His hands flutter like dying birds in an abandoned aviary.”

Sieff added: “Stout was almost as witty as Raymond Chandler. His detective had splendid putdown lines almost as good as Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. And his mysteries were constructed a lot more smoothly than Agatha Christie’s. But you do not expect Chandlerian wit from Conan Doyle, or Conan Doyle’s superbly breathless sense of atmosphere and melodrama from Christie, or Christie’s scathingly clear, unblinking vision of the monstrous crimes that average human nature is capable of all from the same pen. Stout gives you all of it.”

While impressive, this is not the most memorable observation made about Eliot’s face. That honor goes to Henry James, who wrote of her in an 1869 letter: “She is magnificently ugly—deliciously hideous.“ He then added: “In this vast ugliness resides a most powerful beauty which, in a very few minutes, steals forth and charms the mind, so that you end as I ended, in falling in love with her.”

Austen’s writings were far more pleasing to Giuseppe di Lampedusa, the author of the best-selling novel in Italian publishing history: Il Gattopardo (The Leopard, 1958). Of Austen, he said: “Her novels are the Maxims of La Rochefoucauld set in motion.”

Woollcott added: “It is not so much the familiar phenomenon of a hand of steel in a velvet glove as a lacy sleeve with a bottle of vitriol concealed in its folds.” About Mrs. Parker’s attractive and acerbic ways, Howard Teichmann also offered a memorable thought: “Petite, pretty, and deadly as an asp.”

WRITING

(see also AUTHORS and BOOKS and COMPOSITION and EDITING & EDITORS and ESSAYS & ESSAYISTS and LITERATURE and NOVELS & NOVELISTS and PUBLISHING & PUBLISHERS and REVISION & REWRITING and WRITERS and WRITERS—ADVICE ON WRITING and WRITERS—ON THEMSELVES & THEIR WORK and WRITERS—DESCRIBED BY OTHERS and WRITING and WRITING & WRITERS—N.E.C.)

Bierce continued of the subject of precision: “It is attained by choice of the word that accurately and adequately expresses what the writer has in mind, and by exclusion of that which either denotes or connotes something else.”

Birket’s powerful opening sentence opened my eyes about the teaching of writing. With all the emphasis on style, technique, mechanics, and craft, it turns out that the most important thing about the teaching of writing is the personal relationship between the teacher and the student, and what the teacher is able to bring out in the aspiring writer.

In a 1954 diary entry, Anaïs Nin wrote similarly: ”We write to taste life twice, in the moment, and in retrospection.”

QUOTE NOTE: Braverman was reflecting on her short story “Tall Tales From the Mekong Delta,” which won an O. Henry Award in 1990. She said the story almost wrote itself after her mind heard one of the characters (Lenny) begin to speak. About the entire writing experience, she wrote: “I felt like I was strapped in the cockpit with the stars in my face and the expanding universe on my back. In my opinion, that’s the only way a writer should travel.”

Brodsky added: “Sooner or later, and as a rule quite soon, a man discovers that his pen accomplishes a lot more than his soul.”

QUOTE NOTE: Pleasant agony, of course, is a nice example of oxymoronic phrasing.

Burchill added: “It pays a whole lot better than this type of compulsion, but it is no more heroic.”

Conroy continued: “If the writing is good, then the result seems effortless and inevitable. But when you want to say something life-changing or ineffable in a single sentence, you face both the limitations of the sentence itself and the extent of your own talent.”

Didion added: “You can disguise its aggressiveness all you want with veils of subordinate clauses and qualifiers and tentative subjunctives…but there’s no getting around the fact that setting words on paper is the tactic of a secret bully, an invasion, an imposition of the writer’s sensibility on the reader’s most private space.”

Dillard continued: “You make the path boldly and follow it fearfully. You go where the path leads.”

QUOTE NOTE: In Bird by Bird (1994) Anne Lamott wrote about this observation: “You don’t have to see where you’re going, you don’t have to see your destination or everything you will pass along the way. You just have to see two or three feet ahead of you. This is right up there with the best advice about writing, or life, I have ever heard.”

QUOTE NOTE: This has become one of Doctorow’s most popular quotations, but few know that he concluded the thought with these words: “If you do it right, you’re coming up out of yourself in a way that’s not entirely governable by your intellect. That’s why the most important lesson I’ve learned is that planning to write is not writing. Outlining a book is not writing. Researching is not writing. Talking to people about what you’re doing, none of that is writing. Writing is writing.”

Ferber began her observation by writing: “Only amateurs say they write for their own amusement.”

QUOTE NOTE: This looks like the earliest metaphor about opening a vein and bleeding as a metaphor for writing—and it may have stimulated Red Smith’s more familiar observation on the subject (see the Smith entry below). Gallico continued: “If you do not believe in the characters or the story you are doing at that moment with all your mind, strength, and will, if you don’t feel joy and excitement while writing it, then you’re wasting good white paper, even if it sells, because there are other ways in which a writer can bring in the rent money besides writing bad or phony stories.” Thanks to the Quote Investigator for alerting me to this quotation.

Echoing the book’s title, Greene had earlier written, “I can see now that my travels, as much as the act of writing, were ways of escape.” In expressing this thought, Greene cited the W. H Auden observation: “Man needs escape as he needs food and deep sleep.”

ERROR ALERT: The phrase “panic fear” originally appears as you see it above, and not as it often mistakenly appears in quotation anthologies: “panic and fear.”

QUOTE NOTE: Speaking to his companion, Gwen Novak, Richard continued: “There is no way that writers can be tamed and rendered civilized. Or even cured. In a household with more than one person, of which one is a writer, the only solution known to science is to provide the patient with an isolation room, where he can endure the acute stages in private, and where food can be poked in to him with a stick. Because, if you disturb the patient at such times, he may break into tears or become violent. Or he may not hear you at all…and, if you shake him at this stage, he bites.”

The narrator continues with this description of what writing has always been like for him: “For me, it always wants to be sex and always falls short—it’s always that adolescent handjob in the bathroom with the door locked.”

King concluded with this thought about his memoir on the craft: “The rest of it—and perhaps the best of it—is a permission slip: you can, you should, and if you're brave enough to start, you will. Writing is magic, as much the water of life as any other creative art. The water is free. So drink. Drink and be filled up.”

Lamott preceded the observation by writing: “Writing has so much to give, so much to teach, so many surprises. The thing you had to force you to do—the actual act of writing—turns out to be the best part. It’s like discovering that while you thought you needed the tea ceremony for the caffeine, what you really needed was the tea ceremony.”

To see how Lederer pursued the metaphor, go to: A Man of My Words.

Osgood continued: “As an explorer makes maps of the country he has explored, so a writer’s works are maps of the country he has explored. The purpose of both maps is the same: to tell what the country is like.”

Priestley preceded the observation by writing: “Most writers enjoy two periods of happiness—when a glorious idea comes to mind and, secondly, when a last page has been written and you haven’t had time to know how much better it ought to be.”

Shames continued: “Categories like ‘fiction’ and ‘non-fiction’ are probably more useful to reviewers and booksellers than they are to writers. There’s truth in fiction; there’s storytelling in non-fiction. A piece of whatever length still needs a beginning, middle, and end. Funny stuff as well as serious stuff should have a point to make. The challenge is always the same–to entertain and to reveal something about human nature.”

Simenon introduced the thought by saying: “Writing is considered a profession, and I don’t think it is a profession. I think that everyone who does not need to be a writer, who thinks he can do something else, ought to do something else.”

QUOTE NOTE: Smith apparently offered this observation in a variety of slightly different ways over the years, the earliest in a 1949 Walter Winchell newspaper column. According to Winchell, when Smith was asked if writing a daily column was a chore, he replied: “Why, no, you simply sit down at the typewriter, open your veins, and bleed.” It’s possible that Smith was inspired by a similar metaphor offered three years earlier by fellow sportswriter Paul Gallico (see the Gallico entry above). Similar observations have also been attributed, never with any original source information, to other writers, including Gene Fowler, Ernest Hemingway, and Thomas Wolfe. For an informative and entertaining history of the quotation, see this fascinating post by master quotation researcher Garson O’Toole: Quote Investigator

The narrator preceded the observation with this thought: “Let biographers, novelists, and the rest of us groan as we may under the burdens which we so often feel too heavy for our shoulders; we must either bear them up like men, or own ourselves too weak for the work we have undertaken.” A moment earlier, he had introduced the subject with the following tweak of a legendary Euclid remark: “There is no royal road to learning; no short cut to the acquirement of any valuable art.” (see the Euclid entry in GEOMETRY)

Wiesel added: “There is a difference between a book of two hundred pages from the very beginning, and a book of two hundred pages which is the result of an original eight hundred pages. The six hundred pages are there. Only you don’t see them.”

White continued: “A writer is a gunner, sometimes waiting in the blind for something to come in, sometimes roaming the countryside hoping to scare something up. Like other gunners, the writer must cultivate patience, working many covers to bring down one partridge.”

ERROR ALERT: Almost all internet sites, including Wikiquote, mistakenly present the quotation in the following way: “Words can sometimes, in moments of grace, attain the quality of deeds.”

A little later in the book, Zinsser wrote: “The writer’s job is like solving a puzzle, and finally arriving at a solution is a tremendous satisfaction.”

WRITING & WRITERS—N. E. C.

(see also AUTOBIOGRAPHY and AUTHORS and BOOKS and EDITING & EDITORS and ESSAYS & ESSAYISTS and FICTION and LITERATURE and NOVELS & NOVELISTS and PUBLISHING & PUBLISHERS and REVISION & REWRITING and WRITERS and WRITERS—ADVICE ON WRITING and WRITERS—ON THEMSELVES & THEIR WORK and WRITERS—DESCRIBED BY OTHERS and WRITING)

QUOTE NOTE: Melville was not a big fan of Emerson the writer (he once described his writing as “oracular gibberish”), but he greatly admired Emerson the thinker. About deep-thinking writers in general, he described them as a “whole corps of thought-divers, that have been diving and coming up again with bloodshot eyes since the world began.”

WRONGDOING

(see also RIGHT and RIGHT & WRONG)

ERROR ALERT: All over the internet, William E. Gladstone is mistakenly credited with saying “Nothing, that is morally wrong, can be politically right.” He never said anything of the sort. More is the legitimate author of the sentiment.

WRY

(see also HUMOR and WIT)

WYOMING

(see UNITED STATES OF AMERICA—SPECIFIC STATES)