|
Another popular way of achieving chiasmus without using the actual words is to simply say, "And the reverse is true" after making
a reversible statement. One of the best examples of all time is a joke that emerged in Poland during the Cold War:
"What is the difference between Capitalism and Communism?
In Capitalism, man exploits man.
In Communism, the reverse is true."
The joke, which began making the rounds in the 1950s, became so popular that some quote books of that era called it a "modern
Polish proverb." It was a clever way for Polish citizens to snub their noses at the ideology of their Soviet oppressors,
and in the process, point out that the exploitation of man will exist regardless of ideological rhetoric.
Another example comes from Karl Marx, in this line from his 1867 classic, Das Kapital:
"In the pre-capitalist stages of society,
commerce rules industry.
The reverse is true of modern society."
Marx uses a bit of chiastic shorthand here to express his view about the evils of 19th century capitalism.
In his view, the greedy giants of industry had begun to exert an unhealthy and unnatural control over the
buying and selling of goods, perverting what he regarded as the natural order of things.
One can achieve the same chiastic result without actually using the exact words "the reverse is true."
A few years ago, French writer Joseph Roux said:
"Literature was formerly an art and finance a trade;
today it is the reverse."
Those familiar with developments in the publishing industry in the past few decades can appreciate what
Roux is saying, for today it often does seem as if literature has become the trade and finance the art.
In yet another example, Max Baer, the heavyweight boxing champ in the 1930s, said:
"I think golf is good for boxing,
but the reverse is far from being the case."
"The reverse" in Baer's intriguing observation means that boxing is not good for golf. Why golf is good
for boxing and not the reverse I don't know, but it's a good illustration of a variation of the "reverse is
true" theme. So is the following observation from the 18th century English poet, William Shenstone:
"Every good poet includes a critic,
but the reverse will not hold."
Shenstone begins by pointing out that all good poets have an internal critic who provides an important
quality control function. His second point is one virtually all creative artists would agree with, that
every critic does not include a good poet.
One other variation on the "reverse is true" theme is contained in this Bruce Gould observation:
"In England I would rather be
a man, a horse, a dog, or a woman, in that order.
In America I think the order would be reversed."
Gould's point, of course, is that America is not exactly a man's world, for there he'd rather be a woman,
a dog, a horse, and then a man, in that order.
Shorthand chiastic expressions are a wonderful way to streamline language and make thoughts and ideas flow
more smoothly. Take this example from the 19th century German philosopher, Goethe:
"That which is right and prudent
does not always lead to good,
nor the contrary to what is bad;
frequently the reverse takes place."
Phrased this way, most people immediately "get" Goethe's point: good actions sometimes have bad outcomes,
bad actions sometimes good. It's not necessary for Goethe to spell out the entire observation, and it
would have been cumbersome if he had done so.
A final example is the German proverb:
"Marriage is fever in reverse:
it starts with heat and ends with cold."
As with previous examples, the simple words "in reverse" allow readers to understand the message about the predictable loss of ardor
over time in marriage.
Yet another major shorthand way of expressing chiasmus is to say "The opposite is true." In a 1958 interview, French novelist
Françoise Sagan said:
"The illusion of art is to make one believe
that great literature is very close to life,
but exactly the opposite is true."
By ending her observation this way, Sagan asserts that life is much closer to great literature than great literature is to life.
It's an intriguing idea and suggests that, in addition to talking about literature that's true to life, it's also possible to talk
about life that's true to literature.
As with our prior example, it's not necessary to use the exact words "the opposite is true" to achieve the desired result.
When I first introduced the topic of chiastic shorthand here on "Types of Chiasmus" a few months ago, I mentioned an inscription
that Voltaire wrote for a statue of Niobe in Paris:
"The fatal anger of the gods
Turned this woman into stone;
The sculptor did much better—
Namely, the opposite."
The point of the inscription is that the sculptor performed the impressive feat of turning a stone into a woman. To fully appreciate
the inscription, it's necessary to understand the story behind it. Niobe was the Queen of Thebes in Greek mythology. The mother
of numerous children, she made a fatal mistake by disparaging the goddess Leto for having only two children. Leto sought vengeance
and, with the assistance of her two children, Apollo and Artemis, killed all of Niobe's children. In despair, Niobe fled to Mt. Sipylus
in Asia Minor, where Zeus turned her into a stone that wept perpetually. In one of Shakespeare's most famous allusions, Hamlet
described his mother's behavior at his father's funeral by saying, "Like Niobe, all tears."
Edward Albee does something similar in a 1966 Saturday Review article:
"A good writer turns fact into truth;
a bad writer will, more often than not,
accomplish the opposite."
That is, a bad writer will accomplish the questionable feat of turning truth into fact.
As with earlier examples of chiastic shorthand, people will sometimes use the "opposite is true" expression and then go on to formally complete
the thought, even though it's not completely necessary. The American businessman and philanthropist Alfred P. Sloan once said:
"Some have an idea that the reason we in this country
discard things so readily is because we have so much.
The facts are exactly opposite—
the reason we have so much is simply because we discard things so readily."
As president and chairman of General Motors, Sloan was a pioneer in the development of modern management methods (the Sloan School of Management
at MIT is named after him). In this observation, he takes a totally new look at the American reputation for discarding things so readily.
Newt Gingrich did something similar in a lecture he gave on "History and Leadership" a few years ago:
"It is … a major mistake we've made since WWII
to suggest that life is easy
and the difficulties are the aberration.
I think the opposite is true.
I think life is normally hard,
and it's the good moments that are the aberration."
In both observations, Sloan and Gingrich suggest that the opposite is true, and then go on to formally complete their thoughts, presumably to make
sure their point is made.
In a January 1999 article in U. S. News and World Report, John Leo published his annual review of the "best aphorisms and most memorable
sayings" of 1998. One memorable observation came from Nobel laureate Elie Wiesel:
"Once upon a time we talked about
politics in public and sex in private.
Now it's the opposite."
By using a language convention that is understood by almost everybody, Wiesel doesn't have to formally complete the thought to describe how much
the times have changed.
Let me bring this discussion to a close by presenting a few more miscellaneous examples of chiastic shorthand. One of the most powerful quotations
of all time is this provocative observation by Voltaire:
"If God created us in his own image
we have more than reciprocated."
If Voltaire had explicitly laid out the entire thought, the power of his message would have been diluted. However, by having readers complete the
thought on their own, he makes sure they consciously consider what many people at the time considered a heretical notion—that man created God in his
own image. It's another example of the power of chiastic shorthand.
Another intriguing example comes from the Roman writer Phaedrus, a freed Roman slave who wrote fables in the manner of Aesop. Many of the most
popular fables in Europe in the middle ages can be traced back to him. In one of his fables, he writes:
"Those who are despised usually return the favor."
Again, it's a clever little bit of chiastic shorthand, made all the more profound by its brevity. Not only would it have been cumbersome for Phaedrus
to lay out the complete sentiment, it would have weakened his message.
Another example comes from English writer Joseph Addison:
"Health and cheerfulness mutually beget each other."
Addison doesn't have to spell out the thought completely, for we immediately understand his point: health leads to cheerfulness and cheerfulness to health.
A final example comes from the French philosopher Blaise Pascal:
"The sensibility of man to trifles,
and his insensibility to great things,
indicates a strange inversion."
Pascal's use of the word "inversion" indicates that his mind is on a chiastic track, since what he means is, "a strange inversion from the way
things should be." This observation, then, becomes an example of implied chiasmus, with Pascal suggesting that people would be better
off if they showed a sensibility to great things and an insensibility to trifles.
|