"It was Storybook 101:
Boy meets magazine;
magazine gets boy;
boy gets magazine."

"I can write better than
anybody who can write faster,
and I can write faster
than anybody who can write better."

Return to Top

In "The Uses of Misery," James Atlas writes that a large part of Saul Bellow's genius lay in "his ability to capitalize on his experience, to find in circumstances that would defeat a less hearty or resourceful soul the materials of his art." He notes that each one of Saul Bellow's novels was written in response to a dire event-the death of a friend, a psychological crisis, a divorce. For example, Bellow's most famous novel, Herzog, was written after he had discovered that his wife Sondra had been having an affair with his best friend, Jack Ludwig. Atlas notes: (p.98)

"Bellow's life trajectory is cyclical;
Out of misery, triumph;
Out of triumph, misery—
an exhausting but exalted dialectic."

"Life resembles a novel more often
than novels resemble life."

Return to Top

In "Master of Her Domain," Nancy Franklin writes of comedian Sandra Bernhard: (p.112)

"It has always been hard to tell where her
sharp-tongued commentary on celebrity narcissism ends
and her sharp-tongued narcissistic celebrity begins."

"It was never clear whether
he said what he meant
or meant what he said,
and the same applies to Bernhard."

Return to Top

In an "Annals of Advertising" piece titled "True Colors," Malcolm Gladwell chronicles the significance of several female pioneers in advertising history. One of them, Herta Herzog, helped bring the methodology of motivational research, especially the unstructured interview, to advertising. Gladwell says Herzog used "the techniques of healing to figure out the secrets of selling," adding (p.79)

"She wouldn't ask about hair-color products
in order to find out about you …
she would ask about you
in order to learn about hair-color products."

Return to Top

In a "A Helluva Town," architecture critic Paul Goldberger reviewed Gotham: A History of New York to 1898, by historians Edwin G. Burrows and Mike Wallace. He ended his review by quoting their description of New York City: (p.125)

"A city of capital,
not a capital city."

Return to Top

In "Casinos Royale," Paul Golberger describes how mammoth new hotels with classical and European themes are dramatically changing the Las Vegas experience. Twenty-five years ago, bright neon lights and huge, gaudy signs were all that was necessary to draw people to Las Vegas. Times have changed, though, and Goldberger writes that "The new measure of success is size." He chiastically contrasts the past and the present: (p. 73)

"In 1972 … the signs were more important
than any of the buildings …
Now the buildings are more important
than any of the signs."

Return to Top

In "The Town That Ate Itself," Joe Klein places much of the responsibility for the incivility and ugly partisanship in Washington politics at the feet of Newt Gingrich. In a nice example of chiastic alteration, Klein writes:

"Gingrich was obsessed with books about military tactics
and had become something of a reverse Clausewitz:
he considered politics
the extension of war by other means."

Return to Top

In "Around City Hall" Elizabeth Kolbert applauds the calm courage of NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani in the days after the September 11th terrorist attack on the World Trade Center. But she does raise an intriguing chiastic question: (p.40)

"One of the mysteries of Giuliani's tenure has always been
why, in moments of civic calm, he creates such havoc,
and then, in genuine crises, behaves so calmly."

Return to Top

In "The Accidental Führer", Jane Kramer reviews Ian Kershaw's new book, Hitler, 1889-1936: Hubris, which details how Hitler reinvented himself and Germany on his path to power. According to Kramer, Mr. Kershaw was not interested in joining the popular debate among British historians as to whether Hitler was a shrewd cynic or a true believer. She then says of Kershaw: (p. 88)

"Nor was he much interested in joining
the German debate over whether
Hitler had produced the Germany he wanted
or Germany the Hitler it wanted."

Return to Top

In a "Political Scene" article, Louis Menand titles his piece "After Elvis," in a reference to a remark Al Gore made when he accepted the Democratic Vice Presidential nomination—that he finally got the job of his dreams, to be the warmup act for Elvis. In the article, which is primarily about Gore and his views, Menand spends a little time talking about President Clinton. Arguing that Clinton is not so much a liar as a bullshit artist and a pleaser, he writes: (p. 166)

"He cannot bear to be the bringer of bad news—
which is why it is fully believable
that he did not tell his wife
the truth about Monica Lewinsky
(or, for that matter, tell Monica Lewinsky
the truth about his wife)."

Return to Top

In "Sister Act," critic Daphne Merkin reviews Judith Hennesee's new biography, Betty Friedan: Her Life, and reveals how Friedan was cast off for not being revolutionary enough by the very revolutionaries she had originally inspired. According to Merkin, Friedan's "unwavering commitment to a populist constituency" eventually brought on the wrath of the radical elements of the women's movement, especially militant lesbians. The person who would succeed Friedan as the movement's most visible spokesperson, Gloria Steinem, was more effective at steering the course between the divergent elements, but also not without difficulty. Merkin writes:

"Steinem's attempt to correct Freidan's bourgeois bias
and court the clamorously disenfranchised would prove
too radical for the mainstream,
too mainstream for the radicals."

Return to Top

In "Our Money, Ourselves," Daphne Merkin explores the double-edged sword of inherited wealth and reflects on the troubles that come with growing up rich. Discussing the way money can mess with people's minds, she offers a neat example of conceptual chiasmus.

"Naturally, our own irrational demands
strike us as having the force of needs,
while other people's needs strike us
as capricious indulgences."

Return to Top

In a "The Talk of the Town" piece titled "Do Good Fences Make Good Neighbors?" former Secretary of Labor Robert B. Reich discusses the problem of a world of Haves and Have-nots. He talks about the proliferation of "gated communities" in the United States. He describes how Congress has appropriated funds for lengthening and fortifying the American border with Mexico, the "national wall" that separates us from our Third World neighbors to the South. In the article, he makes the astonishing statement that Bill Gates "has a net worth roughly equalling the combined net worth of the least wealthy forty percent of American households." Reflecting on the increasing disparity of wealth, he writes: (p. 31)

"The consequence is that at both perimeters—
the town wall and the national wall—
outsiders are more desperate to get in
and insiders are more desperate to keep them out."

"It may be compared to a cage,
the birds without try desperately to get in,
and those within try desperately to get out."

Return to Top

In a "Fax From Los Angeles" in "The Talk of the Town," Katie Roiphe describes a visit with Ken Starr's doppelgänger (another great word that belongs in the vocabulary of all literate people), Hustler publisher Larry Flynt. After Flynt announced his plan to "out" naughty Republicans, Speaker-elect Robert Livingston resigned from the House. According to Roiphe, Flynt "suddenly became one of the most feared men in Washington." Adding a chiastic twist to the story, Roiphe added:

"The point was not that Flynt
had entered the world of politics
but that politics
had entered the world of Flynt."

Return to Top

In an "Annals of Law" article titled "Low Crimes and Misdemeanors," Jeffrey Rosen describes how Ken Starr and many other federal and state prosecutors have continued an unsettling trend of coercing witnesses by threatening to prosecute them for technical violations of laws that are rarely enforced. Even some traditional conservatives, he writes, become concerned when indictments are used as instruments of coercion, citing the principle: (p.43)

"If a conservative is a liberal
who has been mugged,
a liberal is a conservative
who has been indicted."

Return to Top

In "Swan Songs," Alex Ross accepts official accounts that Tchaikovsky died of cholera, and debunks the lurid rumor that he poisoned himself in some some sort of bizarre "court of honor" deal struck with former law school classmates who were scandalized by his homosexuality. Later, in commenting on the famous "Pathétique" symphony, Ross asserts that the music affects the audience and the performers in proportion to the "force of the feeling" that the audience and the performers bring to the music. He writes:

"In the case of the 'Pathétique,'
art and life join in a vicious circle:
the music has changed the way
that the life has been perceived,"
and the life has changed
the way the music is heard."

Return to Top

In a "Personal History" essay titled "Anatomy of Melancholy," Andrew Solomon details the unexpected and debilitating depression that gripped his life for several years. One line from the piece reads: (p. 48)

"Syndrome and symptom cause each other:
loneliness is depressing,
but depression also causes loneliness."

"Does one sleep oddly
just because of depression or
does one sink into depression
in part because of sleeping oddly?"

Return to Top

In an "Annals of Law" piece titled "Terms of Impeachment," Jeffrey Toobin writes about how the House Judiciary Committee in 1974 tried to clarify what the Framers of the Constitution meant by the vague term, "High Crimes and Misdemeanors." He tells how John Doar, the special counsel leading the Watergate inquiry, recruited one of his law school classmates, James A. Woods, Jr., to lead a team of lawyers to research past presidential peccadilloes and, hopefully, provide guidance as to what offenses were impeachable and which were not. Woods formed a team of ten lawyers that included William Weld, who later became governor of Massachusetts, and, ironically, a 26-year-old lawyer named Hillary Rodham. According to Toobin:

"The Woods team
defined impeachment broadly, asserting
that not all crimes were impeachable and
that not all impeachable offenses were crimes."