|
Sam Allis (February 27, 2000)
Hiawatha Bray (November 15, 2001)
E. J. Dionne (October 19, 2000)
John Ellis (June 19, 1999)
Derrick Z. Jackson (November 28, 2001)
Mark Jurkowitz (March 4, 1999)
Elizabeth Knies (March 21, 1999)
Michael Kranish (March 3, 1999)
Ed Siegel (May 26, 2001)
|
RETURN TO TOP
|
|
Sam Allis. February 27, 2000
|
In a Front Page story titled "The Sermon: Creating Words to Live By," staff
writer Sam Allis writes about the weekly challenge facing all preachers, creating a great sermon. He writes, "A sermon is an
anomaly in the chaos of our lives; a profound idea wrapped in stillness, crafted and delivered with skill and care. It is the
vertical in a horizontal world, the opposite of a sound bite. It honors the capacity of the congregation to absorb a message."
In the article, Allis asks, "What is a great sermon?" He responds with a provocative chiastic question:
|
|
"Is it great because it is remembered
or remembered because it is great?"
|
Berman said this about President Clinton's sworn testimony in the Paula Jones and Monica Lewinsky affairs. At the time, Clinton said his
testimony was "legally accurate" even though it might have been misleading or not completely forthcoming.
|
RETURN TO TOP
|
|
Hiawatha Bray. November 15, 2001
|
In a "Technology & Innovation" column (titled "Microsoft Jumps Into Gaming
Fray"), columnist Hiawatha Bray examined Microsoft's upcoming venture into the computer gaming industry. About to launch the new
Xbox home gaming platform, Microsoft was challenging the two established industry leaders, Sony and Nintendo. Recognizing that a
major marketing and technology battle was about to take place, Bray wrote:
|
|
"I have never been one for those electronic fighting games,
but I'm always up for an electronic gaming fight."
|
|
RETURN TO TOP
|
|
E. J. Dionne. October 19, 2000
|
In an article on the Op/Ed page, syndicated columnist E. J. Dionne wrote that
George W. Bush was sometimes advocating contradictory policies in his run for the White House. Talking about the "balancing act"
of the Republican nominee for president, Dionne wrote: "Bush confirmed that he plans to win on sweeping themes, not specifics.
And he'll happily ignore the contradictions when his themes collide." He concluded:
|
|
"Bush is trying to be an ideological conservative
Without seeming to be a conservative ideologue."
|
His observation is similar to a famous observation James Reston made about LBJ in the 1964 campaign for the presidency:
|
"Everybody is in doubt about whether President Johnson
is a conservative progressive or a progressive conservative,
and he is in clover."
|
|
RETURN TO TOP
|
|
John Ellis. June 19, 1999
|
John Ellis says the Internet is rewriting the rules of customer service
because of its ability to make customers feel important. Two recent
experiences make his point. After joining the 401(K) plan of the Boston
Globe Employees Association, Ellis signed over eight percent of his income to
Putnam Investments, the fund's manager. Instead of a "Thank You" note to
their new client, Putnam sent Ellis an off-putting note telling him his new
PIN code. Ellis felt taken for granted and (understandably) miffed. At the
same time, Ellis was in the market for a new car and found a new General
Motors car-buying service on the web. Within days of expressing interest, he
received seven e-mails from five dealers. One dealer in Long Island said
he'd even drive a car up to Boston so Ellis could give it a test drive. The
two experiences caused a dramatic "turnaround" in Ellis's thinking:
|
|
"A brand I thought was great—Putnam—
I now think is brain dead.
A brand I thought was brain dead—GM—
I now think is great."
|
|
RETURN TO TOP
|
|
Derrick Z. Jackson. November 28, 2001
|
In an article on the Op/Ed page, regular columnist Derrick Z. Jackson
revisited the issue of Black voters feeling disenfranchised in Florida's presidential election last year. He tied the
disputed election to the current war on terrorism with this chiastic creation:
|
|
"It should not be lost to history that Bush
is going after the Taliban in the name
of democracy when he worked so hard
a year ago to ban the tally."
|
|
RETURN TO TOP
|
|
Mark Jurkowitz. March 4, 1999
|
On the 25th anniversary of People magazine, Mark Jurkowitz examined the history of the publication as well
as the issue that commemorated the occasion. About the special issue he wrote:
|
|
"The special 25th-anniversary edition of People
follows the magazine's formula of
'Extraordinary people doing ordinary things
and ordinary people doing extraordinary things.'"
|
|
RETURN TO TOP
|
|
Elizabeth Knies. March 21, 1999
|
In a review of Annie Dillard's book, For the Time Being, Elizabeth Knies, a teaching fellow in
the creative writing program at Boston University, wrote of Dillard:
|
|
"If one cardinal rule of writing is
to 'write about what you know,'
she made it her business
to know about what she wrote
and to describe it in fine detail."
|
|
RETURN TO TOP
|
|
Michael Kranish. March 3, 1999
|
In an article titled "As GOP field fills up, race for donors on," Michael Kranish points out that the schedule of
presidential primaries in the year 2000 has been dramatically compressed. As a result, the pressure to raise
money earlier than in previous years has affected current presidential hopefuls, especially among the Republicans,
where as many as ten prospects are courting a donor base that, at best, could probably support only as many as
three full-fledged campaigns. He also writes:
|
|
"Candidates are in a Catch-22 situation:
They can't raise money
unless they are shown to be credible,
and many can't prove they are credible
unless they raise a lot of money."
|
|
RETURN TO TOP
|
|
Ed Siegel. May 26, 2001
|
In a "Living/Arts" article entitled "Difficult Transition from Crane to
Thane," critic Ed Siegel reviewed a new production of "Macbeth," with Kelsey Grammer of the hit TV sitcom "Frazier" in the
lead role. Siegel noted that Grammer has had classical training and asks, "How easily, then, does Grammer move from Crane
to Thane?" In answering the question, he says, "At the end of this two-hour freight train of an adaptation, the issue remains
Grammer and the vagaries of celebrity rather than Macbeth and the vagaries of power." And then he adds:
|
|
"Or to put it another way,
Grammer doesn't quite rise above the adage that
you can take the boy out of Frazier,
but you can't quite take Frazier out of the boy."
|
|